Answer:
Hitler signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact with Stalin in August 1939. Both the Soviet Union and Germany promised not go into war with each other for ten years.
Answer:
The answer is D stratification because it means the arrangement or classification of something into different groups.
Explanation:
The economy operates according to the law of supply and demand for goods and services. According to this theory, the interaction between supply and demand for a good or service fits and the vector of adjustment is price.
If the price is high, there is more supply than demand. If the price is low, there is more demand than supply. If demand increases, price increases and supply increases. If demand falls, the price falls. That is, the price makes the interaction. There will be a moment where the quantity offered is exactly equal to the quantity demanded, at which point the price practiced is the equilibrium price.
So if an economy is in equilibrium at a time and then the price charged is higher than the equilibrium price, it means that demand has gotten higher than supply.
<u>However, none of the alternatives would explain why a price is charged above the equilibrium price.</u> <u>The answer is the reverse of what is written in alternative (A)</u>. The truth is this: As the quantity demanded rises, the price rises above the equilibrium price. <u>This is the answer</u>.
The alternative (B) is true, although it does not answer the question of the problem. If prices rise, demand falls. This is because the high price discourages consumption.
BTW, I'm an economist and I'm sure.
The Magna Carta meant that
1) the nobles (the barons) could not be imprisoned without a fair trial (restricting the power of the king to imprison)
2) the king could not raise new taxes without a council of baron's approval (restricting the power of the king to raise new taxes)
Explanation:
The Magna Carta was signed by King of England in June 1215 and was the primary document to inflict legal limits on the king's personal powers. Clause sixty one declared that a committee of twenty 5 barons may meet and overthrow the desire<span> of the king—a serious challenge to John's authority as ruling monarch.
</span>This has been the most<span> concern of the nobles </span>within the<span> years preceding the document </span>as a result of<span> taxes had been raised to fund a war against France. The nobility benefited </span>as a result of<span> the </span>royal charter outlined<span> individual rights and </span>emphasised<span> the role of laws in society. Clause </span>thirty-nine<span> states, </span>for instance<span>, </span>that folks ought to<span> be </span>corrected solely once<span> a ruling by their peers or by the sanctions of the law.</span>
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another. This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.
John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience. Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.
Further explanation:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
