Answer:
6.517%
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a multi-year investment and we are not working with a $1 initial investment. There is no mention of compounding so we will use formula A=P0⋅(1+r)N with A=$18,434 and P0=$14,320. We do not know the value of r. However, N=4 years. Substituting the values we have $18,434=$14,320⋅(1+r)4. Divide both sides of the equation by $14,320. Next, take the fourth root of both sides of the equation and subtract 1 to find the decimal form of r.
$18,4341.287291.065170.06517=$14,320⋅(1+r)4=(1+r)4=1+r=r
Finally, convert r to a percent.
r=0.06517×100%=6.517%
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Add 1+1
Answer:
Naomi had the correct measurement the ring weighed 0.625 carats
Step-by-step explanation:
* The diamond ring weighed 5/8 carats
- To know who is right lets change the fraction 5/8 to a decimal number
∵ 5/8 means 5 ÷ 8
- 5 is smaller than 8 so we will multiply it by 10 and
insert decimal point in the quotient (answer of division)
∴ It will be 50 ÷ 8 = 6 and remainder 2/8 ⇒ 1/4
∴ The quotient = 0.6 and remainder 1/4
- 1 is smaller than 4 so we will multiply it by 10
∴ It will be 10 ÷ 4 = 2 and remainder 2/4 ⇒ 1/2
∴ The quotient = 0.62 and remainder 1/2
- 1 is smaller than 2 so we will multiply it by 10
∴ It will be 10 ÷ 2 = 5 without remainder
∴ The quotient = 0.625
* Naomi had the correct measurement the ring weighed 0.625 carats
9514 1404 393
Answer:
30°
Step-by-step explanation:
Consecutive interior angles are supplementary when the lines are parallel:
2x +4x = 180°
x = 180°/6
x = 30°
_____
<em>Comment on units</em>
A lot of times the angles are assumed to be measured in degrees. Using that assumption, x=30 (degrees). When no units are specified, the angle measure defaults to radians. In radians, x = π/6. (We rarely see problems of this nature where the angles are expected to be measured in radians. More often, we see poorly edited questions where angles need to be assumed to be measured in degrees.)
