Answer:
OML
Step-by-step explanation:
How would anyone know this
I hope this helps you
130+x-5+x-35+x+30+75=360
3x=360-195
3x=165
x=55
m (B)=55-5=50
Answer:
-5y
Step-by-step explanation:
15 = 3×5
55 = 5×11
-15xyz = -1 × 3 × 5 × x × y × z
-55xy² = -1 × 5 × 11 × x × y²
-55yz = -1 × 5 × 11 × y × z
HCF = multiply all common factors with the lowest power amongst all 3 expressions
HCF = -1 × 5 × y = -5y
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence.
Null hypothesis; H_o ; μ = 445
Alternative hypothesis; H_o ; μ ≠ 445
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the test which is denoted by H_o. However, the sign of null hypothesis is denoted by the signs of = or ≥ or ≤.
Meanwhile, the alternative hypothesis is one that defers from the null hypothesis. This therefore implies a significant difference in the test. Thus, the signs of alternative hypothesis is denoted by; < or > or ≠.
Now, the question we have is a two tailed test. Thus;
The null hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works correctly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ = 445
The alternative hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works incorrectly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ ≠ 445
