Answer:
By offering different perspective.
Explanation:
Popular historical events, tend to be written from the perspective of the 'Winners'. Even if those winners were doing something unethical during the events, they can cover it by justifying their actions through some sort of divine will or missions.
The perspective from non-European histories offered a different perspective on the colonization.
In the past, colonization's were generally praised as something good. The Europeans masked it as some sort of mission to help other countries in the world improve their civilization. But, they didn't mention the dark side of it. Only after examining non-European histories the world aware of the human exploitation, resources exploitation, and the military's conflicts that's caused by the colonization.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. All of the following were true about Alfred Thayer Mahan except his legacy was achieved through his writings, not his military service. He <span>was a </span>United States Navy admiral<span>, </span>geostrategist<span>, and </span>historian<span>, who has been called "the most important American strategist of the nineteenth century.</span>
I recomend not using Wikipedia since not all its facts are true so maybe if you use a wesite with .org in it , it's better since the facts they give are way more true and logical.
It allowed women to vote when they couldn't before.
Answer:
I hope this helps:
Explanation:
The wave of exploration that began with Columbus’ voyage in 1492 didn’t take long to reach the land that is now Texas. Spain’s conquest of the Americas began on a series of islands in what is now the Caribbean Sea. New colonial cities on those islands soon became hubs for exploration of the mainland. By 1519, exploration had turned to conquest in what is now Mexico, when Hernán Cortés landed on the Yucatán peninsula then pushed inland to the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan.
