1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allsm [11]
2 years ago
14

Does OSHA provide employees with insurance?

Law
1 answer:
nikitadnepr [17]2 years ago
3 0
No bro God will bless you
You might be interested in
The driver should wait at the ______
kompoz [17]
Poop eat ppp poop poops pskne e e e
3 0
2 years ago
(PLEASE HELP ASAP) Outline each part and purpose of the US criminal justice system. Is there one purpose that seems nobler than
aev [14]
Accurate identification of the person responsible, is noble because it means that the judge looks at all evidence and makes an unbiased decision based on evidence solely .
Retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation , and restoration are more noble because it keeps formal criminals from going back into crime and makes the country safer.


Answers may differ :)
7 0
2 years ago
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain what you would do to minimize the tailgating hazard
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

uh make a left? I'm not sure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should U.S. courts continue to adhere to this common law principle, given that our government now regulates so many areas by sta
weqwewe [10]

Answer:

The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.

Explanation:

The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.

Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.

There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.

6 0
3 years ago
15 points.
koban [17]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

a motive is not an element of a crime

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What can care providers do to encourage good eating habits
    5·2 answers
  • What is the main theme of surah ikhalas​
    13·1 answer
  • Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law discuss​
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a part of the triple bottom line concept?
    5·2 answers
  • In England in the 1800's children as young as were executed?
    8·1 answer
  • Need help ASAP I’ll give you brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • Peter, who is the owner of a Wagon R, publishes an advertisement on Ikman.lk for the sale of his
    13·1 answer
  • Should Cuomo resign or not and why?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the job of the U.S. attorneys?
    8·1 answer
  • To meet the standard for the duty of care, a person must:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!