Answer:
Existe una conexión fundamental entre los desastres ambientales y la conciencia individual, en tanto las acciones de los individuos conforman parámetros de conducta social que, repetidos en el tiempo, pueden afectar de forma positiva o negativa al ambiente.
Por lo tanto, en caso de conductas individuales que sean negativas para el medio ambiente, estas (en caso de ser repetitivas y generalizadas) podrían desencadenar desastres ambientales que afecten de forma permanente la estabilidad de los ecosistemas, afectando de forma indirecta la calidad de vida de las personas.
A government allows its people to govern themselves. <3
Answer:
Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.
Explanation:
Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.
This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.
Answer:
I believe the Preliminary hearing is the answer.
Explanation:
-Grand jury- has nothing to do with this part. Their job is to look at the evidence once the judge determines that the case can go to trial.
- Arraignment- is when the defendant is read what charges they are going to brought upon.
-Detention hearing- the judge decides whether or not the person should be Detained.
Hello there, thank you for the question! ^w^
The correct answer would be true!
"Why did we ban retroactive criminal laws? Because they undermine the "central values" of free societies. To allow this would threated the rule of law itself, it would become a rule of officials instead."
Have a great day! <3
