Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Gerrymandering is the term used for the act of negotiating the layout of each district (the territory it will encompass) for the benefit of a specific politician or party. The word comes from the name of the American politician Elbridge Gerry, who in the 1800s redesigned the Massachusetts constituencies to benefit his allies. One of the districts was so absurdly shaped that it was shaped like a salamander and so the second part of the word was forged: gerryMANDERing. Gerrymandering occurs when the government interferes with district design to benefit vulnerable groups (as if it were an affirmative policy).
This political practice can cause polarization because groups not favored by gerrymandering will act contrary and raise issues that contradict the need to appeal to this practice. These questions will create a controversial scenario that will result in polarization.
It is correct to say that gerrymandering causes polarization, but it would be incorrect to say that this would be the only way to water polarization in the country.
1) b 2) b 3) a 4) b 5) b 6) a 7) c
Answer:
I will get a cup of coffee
Explanation:
I wouldnt want my partner to lose trust in me, yes he is experienced and i want to learn from him but i also want to careful/mindful of my dealings with him because everything with him might not be right.
So for him to tell me about the restaurant, i will have to observe the restaurant and try to understand the relationship between him and restaurant. But not to gain trust and confidence with my partner, also my experienced lead, i will get a cup of coffee, not to be too forward, i have to be smart and observe i can just also order what i like because he also ordered what he liked, its about been smart.
The correct answer is Are there gender differences in the effectiveness of computer-based simulations?
Explanation: The causal-comparative method is a type of quantitative investigation that seeks to discover possible causes and effects of a pattern of behavior or personal characteristics by comparing individuals in which it is present with individuals in which it is absent or to a lesser extent.
When putting together a puzzle with her son, Mim selects a puzzle that is slightly too difficult for him to put together alone and adjusts the support offered to her son to fit his current level of performance. Mim is engaging in scaffolding
<u>Explanation:</u>
The term refers to helping or supporting. In the example given, Mim's son is finding difficulties in join the puzzles. Hence, Mim offers help form his son. With that she adjusts to complete the puzzle. Here, with the support of Mim to his son and the efforts of both completes the puzzles.
Hence, we can conclude that Mim is engaging in Scaffolding. The completion of puzzles never happens neither with the effort of Mim nor with the effort of Mim's son. The efforts of Mim and her son together completes the puzzles.
