1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RideAnS [48]
3 years ago
11

100 POINTS!!!! (if u dont actually do it your answer will be deleted and the points will be take back)

History
2 answers:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I believe that he was because it overcomes his negative effects as president.

Explanation:

    I believe that he was because it overcomes his negative effects as president. Yes, he was a traitor and a dictator which I do not stand for. However, he did so much good at the same time. He was the only President to be a veteran in the Revolutionary War and War of 1812. He was a President that remained committed to this nation and protected the common man and common welfare of the common man. He did enslave people but many President's at the time did that too. For example, George Washington owned/inherited slaves as well. In the 1800s, slavery was still in existence and people had yet to learn that it was wrong. It took many movements and reformations when Christianity played a massive role to eliminate slavery and establish equality.

   Andrew Jackson also had some remarkable effects on our economy such as erasing the U.S. economy's debt entirely. He used his commanding presence, strong mindedness, good willpower, and a personality that ultimately showed a reflection of his decisiveness and strength not only as a President but as a person. He grew very popular and became known as the people's President by putting an end to the Second Bank and founding the Democratic Party. Unlike many Federalists, he supported individual rights and liberties and in the pursuit of happiness. He also negotiated in the trade agreement with Great Britain which opened American trade with Canada and the British West Indies. Even though President Jackson owned slaves and tried to veto a bill, without him, our nation would have still been in enormous debt, trade would be limited, the outcomes of the wars would have been different, and we wouldn't have a Democratic Party.

vovangra [49]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Yes he was a great president (not as good as George Washington though)

Explanation:

Jackson become a hero for defeating the British Army at New Orleans, that is what made him such a good president, he was also a general for the United States Army and then In January of 1832, while the President was dining with friends at the White House, someone whispered to him that the Senate had rejected the nomination of Martin Van Buren as Minister to England. Jackson jumped to his feet and exclaimed, “By the Eternal! I’ll smash them!” So he did. His favorite, Van Buren, became Vice President, and succeeded to the Presidency when “Old Hickory” retired to the Hermitage, where he died in June 1845.

You might be interested in
What led to the Battle of Little Bighorn?
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

the U.S. government's attempt to open the Black Hills to development

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did access to oceans and rivers help the progress of industrialization in Britain?
Svetlanka [38]
I'm gonna go with C " It provided for quicker transport of manufactured goods which strengthened trade" Hope this helps.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What impact did the Edict of Nantes have on the religious conflicts in France
qaws [65]
Edict of Nantes
It was issued in 1598, by king Henry IV Bourbon of France. It was the second document (after The January Edict of 1561) issued by a French sovereign to provide religious freedom in the country. It was a consequence of the long-lasting religious conflicts in France between Catholics and Huguenots (other name for Calvinists), situated mainly in Southern France. King Henry IV succeeded Henry III Valois and his infamous mother Catherine de Medici. Henry IV was one of the most prominent leaders of the Protestant opposition in France, but had to convert to Catholicism (for the second time in his life) in order to inherit the throne. The Edict of Nantes was one of the first things that he did as a king, and, basically, it allowed for the Protestants across the land to hold on to the cities that they had turned into their strongholds, while Catholics did the same, too. This was a compromise and angered many, Catholics because they could not get rid of the "heresy" among their lands, and Protestants because they could not succeed in reforming France once and for all.
6 0
3 years ago
Which number correctly labels Hernando de Soto's route of exploration? 1 2 3 4 5 6 Missing Metadata
olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

5

Explanation:

I saw another answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Germany and Japan solved their economic problems by _____.
djverab [1.8K]
C.........................................
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The 1950 Supreme Court decision to ban “separate but equal” law schools in Texas
    7·2 answers
  • What was often the conflict between native amaricans and europeans
    5·1 answer
  • International tensions caused by nationalism and imperialism led to _____, leading to world dominance by the most powerful natio
    5·2 answers
  • __________ is an example of a country with a limited government system.
    7·1 answer
  • Name an object that could be about the same length at each measurement​
    9·1 answer
  • How did industrialization affect the American economy in the 1800s? ​
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these is a belief common to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam?
    6·2 answers
  • Describe 1 specific example of what the 1920's was like:​
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Gandhi call for boycotts on British goods?
    7·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!