Scientists should not have the ability to patent their own research methods as this prevents additionally scientific knowledge to be present within the experimental sciences. The last step of the scientific method is to communicate and share your own findings, and without the ability to do so, it prevents constructive criticisms of the method as well as improvements that would otherwise be prevented from patenting. In the field of genetic engineering specifically, the Human Genome project or (HGP) was an international scientific investigation that promoted communication between scientists rather than the restriction of scientific knowledge. The results of this international collaboration led to multitudes of information being presented regarding human genetic makeup. Therefore, patents ultimately prevent the progression of the sciences and scientific knowledge.
I dont know if there are typos but hopefully this helps.
oogonia no result of oogonia human
ovogonia:Esto quiere decir que la ovogonia tenía 46 cromosomas como se afirmó anteriormente, y el ovocito debe sufrir una reducción por medio de la denominada Meiosis hasta tener 23 cromosomas, 22 cromosomas somáticos y un cromosoma X (22X), el cual es el número Haploide
I hope it helps you.
The cytoplasm is the peanut butter in a PB&J sandwich—it holds the sandwich (cell) together
Domain Classifying Organisms<span> Kingdom phylum Class Order Family Genus Species </span>Why Do Scientists Classify Organisms<span>? </span>Scientists classify organisms<span> to make them easier to study. Taxonomy is very useful to </span>scientists<span> because once an </span>organisms<span> classified they can already learn a lot about it.</span>
