1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
2 years ago
8

What did the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 accomplish

History
1 answer:
frutty [35]2 years ago
4 0
The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 accomplished that the Indians were granted back their assets which had been historically removed from them. These assets included land and minerals, but the larger idea behind it was for Native Americans to be re-assimilated into society and for economic self-sufficiency to be more readily available for the community, as well as a certain amount of sovereignty for the different tribes.
You might be interested in
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
Remove causes of war • Resolve disputes between members of the United Nations • Give legal advice to international agencies The
zvonat [6]

Answer:

Its the World Court.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What encouraged the people to become involved in the Revolutionary War?
marysya [2.9K]

Answer: The french saved Americans from British rule although the British controlled money and thus could lose wars on purpose and still own a commonwealth. The Independence meant British had no support for the new land but would be assured the British pound would always be more valuable than the American dollar

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Witch statement best explains why the northern states most likley favored tariffs on foreign goods
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

are there choices that you have to pick from?

3 0
3 years ago
How much money did the US give Columbia for the Canal land?
ale4655 [162]

The two parties signed the Hay–Bunau-Varilla Treaty. It gave the United States a ten-mile strip of land, all the rights to construct and administer a canal, and the right to protect the canal. In return, the Panamanians received $10 million and an annual rent of $250,000.

so the closest thing you have is C.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was not a factor in the decline of the Roman Empire?
    9·2 answers
  • According to the Chorus, what was the cause of Polyneices’s defeat?
    10·1 answer
  • Helppp! 25 points!!!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • How did satellites impact scientific understanding of space during the late 20th century?
    6·2 answers
  • Can a falcon and an owl occupy the same habitat
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Mexican Army set out for Texas
    11·2 answers
  • What is significant about Georgia’s cotton, Vidalia onion, peach, and peanut crops? (A) Georgia must import these crops from oth
    15·2 answers
  • The duty of collecting state taxes and overseeing the budget belongs to the state _____________.
    6·2 answers
  • · The Gettysburg Address is one of the most famous speeches in American history. How might its fame
    5·1 answer
  • Having unlimited wants for products while having limited resources to create those products is known as
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!