Answer:
A). Scale factor = 
B). Length of the unknown side = 2.75 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Part A
Since, the large rectangle was scaled by a scale factor 'k' to form the smaller rectangle,
Scale factor = 
= 
= 
=
Part B
Scale factor =
Therefore, side length of the unknown side = 
= 2.75 feet
<span> i'm going to be slightly extra careful in showing each step. specific, ln [n / (n+a million) ]= ln n - ln(n+a million). So, we've sum(n=a million to infinity) ln [n / (n+a million) ] = lim(ok--> infinity) sum(n=a million to ok) ln [n / (n+a million) ] = lim(ok--> infinity) sum(n=a million to ok) [ln n - ln(n+a million)] = lim(ok--> infinity) (ln a million - ln 2) + (ln 2 - ln 3) + ... + (ln ok - ln(ok+a million)) = lim(ok--> infinity) (ln a million - ln(ok+a million)), for the reason that fairly much all the words cancel one yet another. Now, ln a million = 0 and lim(ok--> infinity) ln(ok+a million) is countless. So, the sum diverges to -infinity. IM NOT COMPLETELY SURE
</span>
The median is of this set of data is 67
Answer:
Internal validity
Step-by-step explanation:
The internal validity here is weak
Internal validity describes the extent to which an evidence weighs the cause and effect claim. In this study, the internal validity that brought about failure in the new exam is mainly due to the environment where the exam was written and not the new exam itself.
So this validity is weak in claiming that the new exam is not a good substitute for the old exam.
Putting them in the same good environment might help the researchers to draw a better conclusion.
