Two firms, such as a small local, family-owned Italian restaurant and Olive Garden, share few markets and have little similarity in resources, but are nonetheless direct and mutually acknowledged competitors - False
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A state of rivalry that exists between any company that sells identical or similar products and services refers to the competitors. There are two types of competitors such as direct and indirect competitors. Direct competitors are the firms that sells same kind of goods and services. They also focus on the same market segment and also customers.
Indirect competitors refers to those companies that sells similar goods and services but, they will not be having similar end goals. The given statement is false since the firms given are sharing only few of the markets and also have less similarity in the resources. Hence they cannot be competitors either directly or indirectly.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The vertical analisys shows the different components of a finalcial statement related to a total figure in the statement.
Expresses each financial statement item as a percent of a base amount.
Commonly applied to the balance sheet and the income statement. On the balance sheet, set total assets to 100. On the income statement, set net sales to 100. The resulting statement, expressed entirely in percentages is called a common-size statement.
The total figure in the statement set to equal to 100. Each component´s percentage of that total is computed.
Usefull for comparing. The important of specific components in the operation of a business. Changes in the components from one year to the next.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
a. No entry passed
b. Office expense A/c Dr $38
To Cash $38
(Being bank service charges paid)
c. Cash A/c Dr $32
To Interest revenue $32
(Being interest received)
d. No entry passed
e. Accounts receivable A/c Dr $570
To Cash A/c $570
(Being check returned)
The deposit in transit and outstanding checks should not be recorded. So, no entry is passed.
Answer:
Is irrelevant in decision making
Explanation:
Since the suck cost is the cost that no longer is recovered so it should not be a factor to consider when making a decision. For example, you have bought a cinema ticket for this evening, but it is heavily rainy so you may get sick if you go to the cinema. The fact that you have paid for this ticket should not consider whether to go or stay home since you can not get this amount of money no matter what happens.
People can claim his work or inventions as their own.
