Simple: acceptance.
What do i mean by that?
Well, first of all - the feeling of exclusion, rejection is what "kills" them, not exactly their disability (althought it can be heartbreaking at the beggining). So, insert special needs kids/teenagers/adults into specific programs, that are specially designed to attend their needs considering their limitations would provide the always so important sensation of importance and acceptance that not only they - but every human being needs.
You ask me to provide an example? Well ... I don't quite remember the source right now, but i do remember that once, in the past, I've read that a significant amount of people affected by depression are due to their exclusion from groups and the feeling of rejection by the society. Unfortunately, the information that the very Society has ALL kinds of groups that one can imagine will never reach these depressive poeple, the truth is: there is a place where they can feel part of the whole.
This for sure can help to accept and overcome their condition, regardless of the type of disability - physical of mental.
Answer:
if you think that a type of behavior or an idea is very bad and morally wrong, you can say that it is reprehensible.
Explanation:
Answer:
D). Find the supporting evidence the author provides.
Explanation:
While analyzing an argument, the immediate step that must be followed after the 'identification of the claim' would be 'to look for the supporting evidence provided by the author to substantiate the claim.' <u>This would assist in knowing the credibility of the claim and if it is justified logically</u>. Furthermore, <u>the readers can understand whether the conclusions made regarding the claim is trustworthy and reliable</u>. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Touch, the wounding cords that bind and strain represents touch.
In this excerpt, we can read the conclusion of Victor Frankenstein about science: in the 19th century, scientists pursue their studies at any personal or moral cost:
"With a confusion of ideas only to be accounted for by my extreme youth and my want of a guide on such matters, I had retrod the steps of nowledge along the paths of time and exchanged the discoveries of recent inquirers for the dreams of forgotten alchemists. Besides, I had a contempt for the uses of modern natural philosophy. It was very different when the masters of the science sought immortality and power; such views, although futile, were grand; but now the scene was changed. The ambition of the inquirer seemed to limit itself to the annihilation of those visions on which my interest in science was chiefly founded. I was required to exchange chimeras of boundless grandeur for realities of little worth.
Such were my reflections during the first two or three days of my residence at Ingolstadt, which were chiefly spent in becoming acquainted with the localities and the principal residents (..)"
When the objective of the science experiments is only the recognition, the need for making something original and spectacular, to be regarded by other scientists the results could be terrible. For example, the creation of the poor monster of Frankenstein story.
