1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dmitriy555 [2]
3 years ago
13

If Vietnam fell to communlsm, what consequences dld U.S. leaders think would result?​

History
1 answer:
masha68 [24]3 years ago
5 0
T^T hehdbsbshhshdhsh
You might be interested in
In what year was the importation of slaves banned in the United States?
IgorLugansk [536]

The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807 (2 Stat. 426, enacted March 2, 1807) is a United States federal law that stated that no new slaves were permitted to be imported into the United States. It took effect in 1808, the earliest date permitted by the United States Constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did these climates support the development of agriculture?
quester [9]
I don’t see any answer choices?
7 0
3 years ago
How might learning about Mansa Musa and other ancient rulers affect people's perceptions of Africa?
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

It changed stereotypes

Explanation:

In earlier days Africa was seen as a continent not as developed as the rest of the world, being nomads and scavenging for food. With learning about Mansa Musa it is clear that Africa had many developed civilizations. Mansa Musa was extremely rich and it showed how complex Mali already was compared to early Europeans thinking of Africa being uncivilized.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
3 years ago
The Safavid dynasty reached the height of its power under
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Option: A. Shah Abbas.

Explanation:

The Safavid Dynasty arose at the beginning of the 16th century. Shāh Abbās brought the Safavid Empire to the height. He was able to do this by introducing a central government organised by administrators to run the empire. He extended his army after the Ottoman Empire's janizaries by using the latest weapons. He also encouraged the growth of trade and industry and decreased taxes on herders and farmers.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP Match all the following.
    6·1 answer
  • Important facts about the period of building The Great Wall of China.
    8·1 answer
  • Describe how the industrial revolution affected the role of women in the 19th century
    6·2 answers
  • What worldview did most Europeans hold on to in the 16th century?
    11·1 answer
  • What is meant when the Christian Canon is labeled Redemptive History?
    8·1 answer
  • How did jim crow laws poll taxes and literacy tests affect blacks?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the rise of totalitarian dictatorships in Europe eventually lead to the start of World War II?
    14·1 answer
  • The above image is an example of a group that is legally allowed to give/donate money to candidates or government officials in o
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Identify and explain three (3) ways the power of the Federal Government increased over the daily lives of American citizens a
    13·1 answer
  • 10. What did Americans think of loafers and unsuccessful people in colonial times?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!