1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
3 years ago
9

Democrats and republicans aren’t just divided. They live in different worlds. True or false

History
2 answers:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

They can have things in common like both parties want the best for the USA.

const2013 [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

we all live in same land of America or "world". We are just divided by are different beliefs how our government and how our "world" should work.

You might be interested in
HELP ASAP PLEASEEE!!
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

Japan was treated poorly by other countries, because of world war 1 and world war 2, so they forced Japan to do certain things, like trade and have no military.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
explain how the Wilmot Proviso was so controversial in raising the debate over the slave issue again to such intense levels.
Pachacha [2.7K]

The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.

Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)

7 0
2 years ago
An institution near Pittsburg, PA that served to assimilate young
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

unmase

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In deteresa v. abc, a federal appellate court held that
Goshia [24]
<span>ABC did NOT violate Deteresa's rights.

Hope this helps !

Photon</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Similarities of qin dynasty and han dynasty
Dmitriy789 [7]
Despite the Qin Dynasty being stricter than the Han Dynasty, they still had their similarity in their systems. They both have emperors who rule over all of the people during their time, plus they both have an idea of splitting the land into two provinces. These provinces were ran by officials of the government.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which three conditions helped bring about African independence?
    8·2 answers
  • What the similarities between crack the jokes and crack the egg ! lol
    13·1 answer
  • Which three regions on the map did Alexander The Great conquer?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of "sncc" during the early years of the civil rights era?
    5·2 answers
  • Order of the causes of the civil war
    6·1 answer
  • The preamble to the U.S. Constitution basically says...
    11·1 answer
  • How did racism and discrimination lead to the rise of black nationalism?
    15·1 answer
  • Identify the causes of ecological imbalance and how it affects biodiversity?​
    8·1 answer
  • Making pottery was a part of the____of Native Americans.
    7·2 answers
  • What was the main function of George Creel’s “four-minute men”?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!