1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
2 years ago
9

PLLSSS I NEED HELPPP NOWWW FOR TEST

History
2 answers:
Lisa [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B

Explanation

I hope this help if not it’s A then

beks73 [17]2 years ago
4 0
Yea I agree with the person who commented It is B I’m positive
You might be interested in
Ancient and medieval sword makers fashioned swords from metals and alloys. Apply your knowledge of the properties of metals and
natima [27]

Answer:

copper and iron  swords were easier to make but less durable while bronze and steel swords were more effective for combat but more difficult to fashion.

Explanation:

Pros

  • Copper: It was a very common material and it could be sharpened easily.
  • Iron: Like copper, very easy to find and harder than copper, so it is a better option to fabricate iron swords than copper swords.
  • Bronze: Bronze is harder than copper and its rust is just shallow which make bronze swords way durable in comparison.  With the materials in hand (copper and tin), it was easy to fabricate bronze swords on a great scale.
  • Steel: This is the most durable and hardest of all the elements above.

Cons

  • Copper: Easy to get rusty and  be broken.
  • Iron: Sucseptible to severe oxidation, although it is more durable than copper.
  • Bronze: As this is an alloy, it requires copper and tin, which it is not very common to find close each other, so it makes difficult to make bronze swords. Additionally, bronze weapons do not last very much; they are easy to break.
  • Steel: Unlike bronze, steel rusting can wreck the sword if it is treated in time. Additionally, on ancient times, steel forges were very uncommon as not many knew the way to create steel from iron and carbon, so steel swords were very expensive and more likely to find in hand of  kings and royal guards.  
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
D. The power of the national government is divided among what three branches?
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches are the three branches of U.S. government.

7 0
2 years ago
Based on Voices of Freedom 51 and 52 contrast the views of Tecumseh and Felix Grundy over the land in the Midwest in the early n
malfutka [58]

Answer:

The war was the only solution to solve issue over the land in the early 19th century.                      

Explanation:              

Tecumseh organised a Native American confederacy to stop white settlement in the Northwest Territory. Tecumseh took side with the British during the War of 1812 because of settlers who moved to the Northwest Territories and created farms on Indian land. The hostile between the two groups began when pioneers ignored the treaties signed between Americans and Natives Americans.

Felix Grundy was a prominent figure among the so-called War Hawks, who demanded the war of 1812 against British. The reason for the war was America's desire to expand its territory and to stop the British restrictions on American trade.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a reason for the isolation of the United States in the 1930s?
vlabodo [156]
There were various reasons why the United States decided to follow a policy of isolation during the 1930's.

First off, the Great Depression pushed people away from foreign affairs as they wanted to resolve internal affairs first.

Second off, the number of soldiers lost in World War I kept citizens of the USA weary of foreign countries.

Because of World War I, many citizens that were advocating for isolationism pushed the country to stay out of World War II and affairs that they had no business in (at least until Germany sunk the Lusitania).

Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Rome's greatest public speaker ​
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:    Cicero

Explanation:  Marcus Tullius <em>Cicero</em> was one of the greatest Roman orators and possibly the greatest. He was also a successful politician, lawyer and philosopher. It is believed that his influence on the Latin language is immeasurable, because he also contributed as a prose stylist, known for exceptional and convincing speeches. He had so much influence on the speech and the history of prose, that until the 19th century was a challenge, that almost all the prose work in that field was in fact a reaction to his own model.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these results from the repeal of an items subsidies?
    14·2 answers
  • What statements best reflects the economic policy of harding and coolidge
    10·1 answer
  • I NEED ANSWERS ASAP
    8·1 answer
  • How were Kush and Egypt similar?
    11·2 answers
  • President Nixon believed that the
    10·2 answers
  • How did Hitler get the rest of the world to believe that Poland started the war? * *
    6·2 answers
  • What is the largest body of water in the world?
    7·2 answers
  • In the below cartoon, which statement most accurately represents the phrase “He makes votes for me”
    15·1 answer
  • I'm getting bored. Someone plis hit me up!!!​
    12·2 answers
  • Based on this excerpt, which U.S. government action during the late 1800s reflects Carnegie's point of view?Areducing taxes on t
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!