This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Religious pluralism recognizes that there are different ______________ and religious truth is interpreted from multiple perspectives in a pluralistic world. (pages 1-2)
Select one:
a. panorama of colorful images
b. chances are the hands that prepared them
c. options and varieties of beliefs
d. yogis in contorted postures
Answer:
Religious pluralism recognizes that there are different c. options and varieties of beliefs
and religious truth is interpreted from multiple perspectives in a pluralistic world.
Explanation:
Religious pluralism is connected to tolerance and acceptance. A religious pluralist person or society, for instance, tolerates more than one religious belief to be practiced by the people. They also accept that more than one belief has truth in it, rejecting the rigid attitude that defends the idea that only one religion is true - or leads to the truth - and should, for that reason, be the only one practiced.
I would probably say that i was in gym class in 7th grade and i tripped in front of my crush and his friends HHAHA anyways thank you, have a good day too :)
Answer:
She believed harmony to be more than the combination of voices and instruments, for her it represented the balance of body and soul, the interconnectivity of man with the universe
Explanation:
Answer:
The meaning of "exile" here is "forget," which means <u>"to forget the hungry children and the homeless refugees in the world by not doing any action to alleviate their sufferings. </u>
Explanation:
The sentence has been taken from Elie Wiesel's speech on <em>"The Perils of Indifference." </em>It talks about human's worth or value by showing <em>empathy</em> and <em>engaging with people.</em> This speech was made in relation to his captivity and what he felt by being held in prison.
For Wiesel, <u>humans are forgotten when no one responds to their sufferings.</u> This then creates a feeling of indifference towards them, which for him is an end to humanity and not a beginning. When people stops responding to the sufferings of others, they lose their humanistic capability of "keeping in touch."
Thus, this explains the answer.
