If your looking for the x-intercept then is would be 2
Hope this helps
Y=145, I’m not sure about X
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Her error is in squaring (2y)²
She has (2y)² = 2y²
when it should be 2y × 2y = 4y²
Then
(2y)² = 6² + 8²
4y² = 36 + 64
4y² = 100 ( divide both sides by 4 )
y² = 25 ( take square root of both sides )
y = 
= 5
Step-by-step explanation:
the line passes through (6, 2) and (10, -1),
the slope =
(-1-2)/(10-6) = -3/4
the equation :
y-2 = -3/4(x -6)
The expression for g(x) is wrong, you skipped some signs and, apparentely, some parentheses. The rigtht expression for g(x) should be g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4. Note that g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4 it is the same that f(x+1) + 4. When you add a number to the argument, the graph of function is shifted that number of units to the left; and when you add a number to the function the graph shifts that number of units up. Therefore, the steps that will translate f(x) = 3x to g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4 is shift f(x) one unit to the left and four units up.
For the answer to the question on w<span>hich steps will translate f(x) = 3x to g(x) = 3x + 1 + 4? The answer to this question is
</span>f(x) = 3x one unit to the left and four units up
