(Strayer, D. L. 2007), A study by Carnegie Mellon University showed that drivers talking on cell phones can miss seeing<u> 50 % </u>of their driving environment, including pedestrians and green lights.
<h3>What are the risks of using cell phones while driving?</h3>
There are studies, which have found that drivers who use cell phones while driving are more likely to face accidents resulting in injuries and there is a correlation that exists between phone use and accountability for crashes.
Therefore, (Strayer, D. L. 2007), A study by Carnegie Mellon University showed that drivers talking on cell phones can miss seeing<u> 50 % </u>of their driving environment, including pedestrians and green lights.
learn more about risks of cell phones:
brainly.com/question/4733015
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Work in Process A/c - Assembly department A/c Dr $52,320
Work in Process A/c - Finishing department A/c Dr $41,440
To Manufacturing overhead A/c $93,760
(Being the overhead are allocated to the Assembly and Finishing Departments)
The allocation of the assembly department equals to
= Raw material × percentage of labor cost
= $32,700 × 160%
= $52,320
The allocation of the finishing department equals to
= (Factory labor cost - factory labor) × percentage of labor cost
= ($63,800 - $37,900) × 160%
= $25,900 × 160%
= $41,440
Answer:
Allocated MOH= $99,960
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the predetermined overhead rate:</u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 200,000 / 336,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $0.595 per direct labor dollar
<u>Now, we can allocate overhead to Product 3:</u>
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 0.595*168,000
Allocated MOH= $99,960
Answer: The court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, we should note that the court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
We should note that under a predominant purpose test, it will apply when the transaction involved is Mena for goods sales and not for the service sales.
