Answer:
$1,575
Explanation:
Calculation for the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019
Based on the information given the maximum or highest amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be the amount of $1,575 reason been that a person or an individual which age is less than the age of 50 can have a maximum contribution of the amount of $6,000 for either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 in which it can not in any way exceeds the earnings and secondly Investment income are not contributed to IRA which means that in the case of Victoria the amount of $1,575 will be contributed to either a traditional or Roth IRA while the amount of $100 which was earned as a result of her interest from her saving account will not be contributed.
Therefore the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be $1,575
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.
Explanation:
Ideological power
refer the above attachment
Answer: No.
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, later amended by the Clayton Act (1914) prohibits agreements in restraint of trade and monopolization. I expressely outlaws competing firms to conspire to consolidate the market by unfair means, restraining the trade of others.
In this case, the standards for non-wood bats set by the NCAA and the NFHS are not meant to establish a monopoly and they don´t restrain Marucci´s trade.
