The british passed the stamp act to replace money they lost during the Seven Years War with France, aka the French and Indian War.
This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.
FOR
-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights
-People wouldn't voluntarily pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.
-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority
-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest
-corruption
AGAINST
-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?
-wrongfully convicted
apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though
Answer:
have a meeting to decide what they are going to do
Explanation:
Answer: A homocide.
Explanation: Mainly for the reason of a suspect not caring about the life of another human being. If it was taken to court, it would be garnered prison time, lifetime if the lawyer isn’t very good.
