Instead of directly addressing the problem, an abuser will medicate it away by indirectly denying its impact for a short while.

- During the Industrial Revolution in Europe,

irga5000 [103]

Answer:

The answer is: thief catchers.

Explanation:

Thief catchers were popularly known as "thief-takers." This was a job in the<em> 19th century of England </em>that allowed the hired person (thief-taker) to capture a criminal. They were hired by the <u>victims of the crime</u> and was also paid with bounty by the government (just like bounty hunters).

The reason behind this was the disorder that occurred in the streets of England when a huge number of people migrated to the area. In the <em>17th century, </em>the<u> existing of property crimes became evident.</u><u> Theft became a common crime.</u> These included<em> robberies, shoplifting, counterfeiting money and the like. </em>Since it was very hard to chase and arrest offenders, the thief-takers became a new role in the society. The number of people who applied for the position grew until it became popular in the 19th century.

6 0

3 years ago

What are the three levels of court in the United States?

Marianna [84]

Answer:

ok The federal court system has three main levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, the final level of appeal in the federal system.Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Document the incident to

Andrej [43]

Answer:

To identify the decedent, determine the cause and manner of death and certify the death.

Explanation:

The medical examiner or coroner uses the information to perform their first line functions which are to identify the decedent, determine the cause and manner of death and certify the death.

4 0

2 years ago

Molly Weasley bought a Great Lakes spa from Mundungus, a dealer who was selling spas at the state fair.

BartSMP [9]

1) The theory of product liability under which Weasley could have sued Mundungus to recover for Ginny's injuries is strict product liability.

However, the facts do not support such a claim because the negligence of Weasley caused Ginny's injuries. How could a child of six years be left alone in a spa?

<h3>What are the theories of product liability?</h3>

The theories of product liability, which involve injury or damage caused by a defective product, include negligence, breach of contract/warranty, and strict liability.

For strict liability to be imposed on Great Lakes, Weasley must prove that the tort occurred based on Mundungus' irresponsibility. The question is, was Mundungus responsible for caring for Ginny or her mother?

2) The Privity of contract would not be required in a product liability case against Great Lakes. Since the spa is a product of Great Lakes while Mundungus sold it to Weasley, there is no basis for Great Lakes to deny privity of contract.

<h3>What is the privity of contract?</h3>

Using privity of contract as a basis of defense means that only parties to a contract have right to sue and be sued so that they can enforce the rights and obligations arising from the contract.

3) The six requirements that Weasley must meet for action in strict product liability against Great Lakes are proving that:

The spa caused Ginny to be injured and not Weasley's negligence.
The spa that injured Ginny was defective.
The defect of the spa caused Ginny's injury.
The defect of the spa made it dangerous for Ginny.
The negligence arose from Great Lakes.
Great Lakes breached the contract warranty.

4) The defenses to product liability that Mundungus or Great Lakes can assert are as follows:

Weasley lacks the locus standi.
No duty of care was owed to Ginny by Mundungus or Great Lakes.
Weasley misused the spa through her negligence.
Weasley must know the riskiness of abandoning Ginny in the spa.

Thus, none of the theories of product liability supports Weasley's case.

Learn more about the theories of product liability at brainly.com/question/17202560

4 0

2 years ago

Help please!! This is timed

Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

Explanation:

it is not the stores fault, she is responsible

4 0

3 years ago