Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
55.5
Step-by-step explanation:
find the median - in this case it's 60
then group the upper and lower halves of the data:
(11, 19, 35, 42) 60 (72, 80, 85, 88)
now we find the medians of those sets:
35 + 19/2 = 54/2 =27
80 + 85/2 = 165/2 = 82.5
then subtract those two medians to find the interquartile:
82.5 - 27 = 55.5
Answer:
8/12
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it’s right
Answer:
Contents of the blood flow is called hemorheology in the book require addi tional clarification to be useful to you
