Answer: I would advise them to think about what loyalty means to them and then practice being loyal to people.
Hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
Answer: Internal mental processes
Explanation: An internal mental process happens within someones mind, but are able to be studied. The internal mental process focuses on one's memory, attention span or lack there of, and perception. Due to using memory to recall events that may happen again because they have happened a first time, they are using/studying someones internal mental process.
Writing about nineteenth-century women's travel writing, Lila Harper notes that the four women she discussed used their own names, in contrast with the nineteenth-century female novelists who either published anonymously or used male pseudonyms. The novelists doubtless realized that they were breaking boundaries, whereas three of the four daring, solitary travelers espoused traditional values, eschewing radicalism and women's movements. Whereas the female novelists criticized their society, the female travelers seemed content to leave society as it was while accomplishing their own liberation. In other words, they lived a contradiction. For the subjects of Harper's study, solitude in both the private and public spheres prevailed—a solitude that conferred authority, hitherto a male prerogative, but that also precluded any collective action or female solidarity.
Answer:
E. While traveling alone in the nineteenth-century was considered a radical act for a woman, the nineteenth-century solitary female travelers generally held conventional views.
Explanation:
What best characterizes the "contradiction" that the author refers to is "While traveling alone in the nineteenth-century was considered a radical act for a woman, the nineteenth-century solitary female travelers generally held conventional views."
This is evident in the passage where it was written that "Whereas the female novelists criticized their society, the female travelers seemed content to leave society as it was while accomplishing their own liberation."
Answer:
Kafka gives no indication as to what may have caused Gregor's transformation.
Explanation:
Although we can interpret what Gregor's transformation represents, we have no indication of what caused it, since the author left no factor expressed in the narrative, probably to stimulate our interpretation of Gregor's dehumanization in the midst of capitalism and the exploitation he went through. Gregor's family and himself, see transformation as a random occurrence, something of chance, as a disease.
