Cost-plus pricing<span>, also known as mark-up </span>price<span>, takes place when a firm calculates its unit costs and then adds a percentage profit to determine </span>price<span>.</span>
Answer: False
Explanation:
If you want to hedge the risk of owning the stock then that would mean that you want to take measures to ensure that you don't lose out if prices fall.
A call option is not the way to do this because call options are bought with the expectations that prices will go up. If you buy call options then and the prices fall, you would make a loss on both the call options and the stock that you own.
A good way to hedge this would be to take Put options on the stock. Put options help you benefit if prices fall because you would be allowed to sell at a certain price unaffected by the fall in prices.
Answer:
The answer is $56.68
Explanation:
Solution
We recall that:
The firm paid a dividend of =$7.80
The projected growth of dividends is at a rate = 9.0%
The annual return = 24.0%
Now,
V = ($7.80 * (1.09)/(.24 - 0.9)
= (8.502)/(.24-0.9)
= (8.502) * (-0.66)
= $56.68
Therefore, this would be the most we would pay for the stock. If we paid less than that, our return would be above the 24%.
Answer:
b. the creation of different meanings based on social and cultural context.
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this provides an example of the subjectivity of the interpretation process. This basically means that the creation of someones judgement is based on personal opinions from social and cultural context. Therefore it can be said that the answer to this question would be b. the creation of different meanings based on social and cultural context.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Check the following explanation.
Explanation:
The goals of managers and shareholders are not always aligned. Agency theory suggests this misalignment creates the need for costly monitoring through compensation contracts.
To align the goals of the two parties,compensation contracts should be designed to motivate the executive to make decisions that will not only increase his or her wealth, but will also increase shareholder wealth. Steps taken to increase shareholder wealth should be reflected in improved firm performance.Including both components in the contracts helps ensure the decisions of the executive are linked to various time horizons.
Shortterm components motivate the executive to make decisions that have an immediate affect on the firm. Long-term components are necessary to lengthen the decision horizon of the executive and enhance the likelihood of continued improvement in firm value. The long-term incentives in these contracts can be based on improved shareholder wealth as well as improved firm performance.
