<span>With
the existence ever-evolving and incessant development of technology from the
past to the present century. People have been more digital and electronic, the “wireless
era”. Unlike the technology of the late 1800’s to early 1900’s it’s a tough and
took them a colossal step to actually use the existent device/s during this
age. With the turn of the 21st century, from trains, cars,
airplanes, to telephones, computers, and the most influential technology ever
developed yet is the turn of the internet which significantly boosted the urban
and cosmopolitan growth. How? In the sense of faster and wireless technology,
it promoted urban growth in many aspects –communication, locale and global
services, demands, industrialization, business and trade, and even people’s
lives through transportation, accessibility and ease of use. In the old days,
even letters and courier parcels takes days to be received, months and years to
travel and business was limited in the course of trade. It seemingly made all
the tedious processes of the early centuries to now at one touch to ripple at a
larger scale.</span>
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Answer:
To end his personal suffering
Explanation:
