Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with "anger over corruption," since it was clear to the public that McCarthy was doing more harm than good. </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In 1883, Hungarian immigrant Joseph Pulitzer bought the troubled New York World. His readership was "the common man," and he succeeded in reaching readers with light, sensationalistic news coverage, extensive use of illustrations, and circulation-building stunts and promotions. This brand of journalism became known as yellow journalism.
This kind of journalism focused on extreme or sensationalistic news or was reported in a sensationalistic way to capture the attention of readers. Pulitzer had a fierce competitor in Hertz, another newspaper owner and they competed for more readers. The way the found it better was not more objective news but sensationalistic news that entertained the readers.
Farmer's struggled more during the 1920's, because everyone one focused on factory production
Disadvantages, I believe, but am not sure are factual, were with a strong executive branch, the people feared that the president would manipulate his powers, just like the king of England had done so with the colonies and those who disagreed with it thought that the smaller sates wouldn't be voiced.
<h2>Answer</h2><h3>This saying was a response to policies like the Sugar Act. Colonists were not allowed to vote for British leaders who made these policies.</h3><h2>Explanation</h2>
The Americans were forced to pay taxes to the British government without having any representative in the corridors of power of the British Parliament. This served as a constant reminder to the fact that the Americans were under a tyrannical rule by the Britishers and followed the basis of the revolution that followed in return.
