1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shusha [124]
3 years ago
6

Steps taken for arrest warrant

Law
1 answer:
Effectus [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Steps in a Trial

Arrest Procedures

When an officer arrests someone, the accused is taken into custody. Similarly, when a grand jury returns an indictment or a prosecutor files an information, a judge or magistrate issues a warrant for the arrest of the person charged if not already under arrest, and the person is taken into custody. (Sometimes, for less serious offenses, defendants are issued citations to appear rather than being arrested.)

When people are taken into custody, before they are questioned, they must be informed that anything they say may be held against them in a court of law, and that they have the right to remain silent,

consult with a lawyer before and during questioning, and

have a lawyer appointed to represent them if they cannot afford one.

They are also told that they can exercise these rights at any time. In some states, there may be variation in this statement for juveniles. For example, juveniles might be warned that if the juvenile court waives jurisdiction over them, then the statements they make can be used against them in a court proceeding in which they will be tried as an adult.

These are often referred to as the Miranda rights because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1966 in Miranda v. Arizona that when law enforcement officers question people taken into custody, the evidence garnered from their interview cannot be used against them unless they have been informed of their constitutional rights to counsel and to remain silent.

If a person has been arrested without a warrant, law enforcement officials may hold him or her for a period of time necessary to handle certain administrative tasks (fingerprinting, checking to see if the person is the subject of any outstanding warrants, etc.) This time may vary depending on the facts of the particular case, but it’s generally quite brief, usually no more than 48 hours. They may not hold the person beyond that time without an initial or first appearance or arraignment before a judge or magistrate (a public official vested with certain judicial powers in the federal system and the systems of some states).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are the main causes of death and injuries on scaffolds
oee [108]

Answer: Scaffold support or planking giving way, either due to defective or damaged equipment or improper assembly, leading to falls and injuries to those below.

...

Common scaffold accident injuries include:

Spinal cord injury.

Traumatic brain injury.

Paralysis.

Broken bones.

Organ damage.

Lacerations.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Three main sources of international law
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

Sources of international law include treaties, international customs, general widely recognized principles of law, the decisions of national and lower courts, and scholarly writings.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Is it illegal for a 24 year old to date a 39 year old?
Mademuasel [1]

Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.

Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.

7 0
3 years ago
Termino para designar a persona que se infecta pero no desarrollan ningun sintoma
Anit [1.1K]
‘Asintomático’ sería su respuesta.
4 0
2 years ago
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.

Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do the protestors with the signs saying "A livable planet is an unalienable right” and "Life, liberty, property” use the Dec
    6·1 answer
  • Entrepreneurs need to know the basics of accounting even if they hire a professional because
    7·2 answers
  • Drugs affect your _____.<br><br> for drivers ed btw :)
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement is true?
    14·1 answer
  • What are less than lethal weapons designed to do
    5·1 answer
  • Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a risk involved in both sales and leases?
    8·1 answer
  • Pros and cons of euthanasia
    9·1 answer
  • Explain one of the options for proposing an Amendment.
    12·1 answer
  • State a proposition of policy and demonstrate
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!