1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shusha [124]
3 years ago
6

Steps taken for arrest warrant

Law
1 answer:
Effectus [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Steps in a Trial

Arrest Procedures

When an officer arrests someone, the accused is taken into custody. Similarly, when a grand jury returns an indictment or a prosecutor files an information, a judge or magistrate issues a warrant for the arrest of the person charged if not already under arrest, and the person is taken into custody. (Sometimes, for less serious offenses, defendants are issued citations to appear rather than being arrested.)

When people are taken into custody, before they are questioned, they must be informed that anything they say may be held against them in a court of law, and that they have the right to remain silent,

consult with a lawyer before and during questioning, and

have a lawyer appointed to represent them if they cannot afford one.

They are also told that they can exercise these rights at any time. In some states, there may be variation in this statement for juveniles. For example, juveniles might be warned that if the juvenile court waives jurisdiction over them, then the statements they make can be used against them in a court proceeding in which they will be tried as an adult.

These are often referred to as the Miranda rights because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1966 in Miranda v. Arizona that when law enforcement officers question people taken into custody, the evidence garnered from their interview cannot be used against them unless they have been informed of their constitutional rights to counsel and to remain silent.

If a person has been arrested without a warrant, law enforcement officials may hold him or her for a period of time necessary to handle certain administrative tasks (fingerprinting, checking to see if the person is the subject of any outstanding warrants, etc.) This time may vary depending on the facts of the particular case, but it’s generally quite brief, usually no more than 48 hours. They may not hold the person beyond that time without an initial or first appearance or arraignment before a judge or magistrate (a public official vested with certain judicial powers in the federal system and the systems of some states).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When Edwin Sutherland closely examined companies in the United States, what was he surprised to find?
Kitty [74]

Answer: D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.

Explanation:

Edwin Sutherland was one of the most famous and influential criminologists to ever live. He gave several theories as to why people commit crime such as having grown up around crime and seeing it as normal.

His research into White Collar crime gave him eternal status as he broached a subject that many had avoided because the world then refused to accept that the higher economic classes could commit crime yet his research showed that many times, companies and their bigwigs violated the law intentionally.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the main reason banks loan money to consumers?
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

The answer is to make money.

Banks will loan you money and then charge you a high interest rate to pay back on top of the money you loaned

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nation A is neighbors with Nation B. When an international crime lord who operates in both countries is captured by Nation A, it
NeX [460]

Answer:

<h3>Act of State Doctrine.</h3>

Explanation:

According to the U.S Constitution, the Act of State Doctrine is a principle that respects the sovereignty of an independent state. It declares that sovereign states should  respect the independence and integrity of other independent sovereign states.

The doctrine implies that domestic decisions of sovereign states should not be questioned by other independent states. Domestic decisions of another independent state should be respected by other independent states.

Here, since Nation A has apprehended the culprit in its country, it has the full right to decide what punishment and verdict should be given to the culprit.  Through the Act of State Doctrine, it gains full immunity to handle the culprit on its own discretion. Nation B has no right to make any claims or alter the decision of Nation A.

3 0
3 years ago
Mr. Bakhtawar, a Individual Person, has following information for the Tax Year 2020.
mr_godi [17]
Just try to search it
7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is not an obvious racial determination
Basile [38]

Answer:

cfijfijcnji

Explanation:

j jcnijd cb hb cibi

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do the people do what they do in verse 31?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following levels of local government can collect taxes?
    14·1 answer
  • True or False? It is illegal to call a pickle, a pickle if it doesn't bounce in CT?
    8·2 answers
  • What happens when children are born in prison and no one can take care of them
    6·2 answers
  • Summarize the most important factors establishing and ending the "Hands Off Doctrine" I need help
    8·1 answer
  • As a person's BAC level increases, it becomes difficult for them to judge the distance of...
    13·1 answer
  • Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a nonprimary homicide?
    11·1 answer
  • Is amoung us sussy?!?!?!?!??! NEED TO KNOW WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following country is follow presidential dimocracy system a) france b) Senegal c) USA​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!