good morning,
Answer:
10×(1-0.2ⁿ)
Step-by-step explanation:
1.6/8=0.2
0.32/1.6=0.2
0.064/0.32=0.2
let S represent the sum of n term then S=8×[(1-0.2ⁿ)/(1-0.2)] = 10×(1-0.2ⁿ).
:)
Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.
R*F = 5LF, R*M = 9LM, L*F + L*M = 18, R*F + R*M = 122.
<span>RF=50, </span><span>LF=10</span><span>, RM=72</span><span>, LM=8. Fill in the graph with this info and assume there aren't people that are transgender</span>
Answer:20474.7
Step-by-step explanation:
68249 divide by 10 then multiply by 3
