Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
The Spanish established permanent settlements in North America. The first settlement was a Spanish fort called St. Augustine in Florida. It was established in 1565. Its primary function was that of a base camp for explorers who explored the continent. It was also used as a centre to convert the local Native Americans to Roman Catholicism. There were a few settlements established in outlying areas. These did not last. They were either attacked and destroyed by the Native Americans, or they had to close because they could not support themselves economically.
<span>Understanding the consumers’ expectations of quality, helps a marketer correctly assess the target market’s evaluation of price</span>
Answer:
Kosslyn's experiment found that the brain activity in the visual cortex:
<u>Plays a causal role in both perception and imagery.</u>
Explanation:
The investigation over the visual cortex done by Kossy, discovered that mental imaginary would activate the area of the visual cortex. This is so important because it proves that the brain, specifically this part, can operate without the real visual stimuli.
In other words the experiment proved that the visual cortex is not exclusivly activated when visual stimuli is present. This part of the brain can be activated by mental representation of for instance and object.
This experiment is important for the understangin of perception and memory.
The correct answer is Social Learning
Explanation:
Social learning is a term used to describe the way we model our behavior, beliefs, and actions based on others as we observe and then imitate their behavior. This is a learning theory that relies on social interactions and personal relationships with others as we learn from family, close friends, and classmates. The case presented is an example of Social learning because two close friends show the same behavior in terms of sociability and it is likely one of them has learned from the other by observing him and then imitating him.
