What would be the best way to affect or change a policy at the national level

jolli1 [7]

Answer:

The communication process involves understanding, sharing, and meaning, and it consists of eight essential elements: source, message, channel, receiver, feedback, environment, context, and interference

Explanation: pls mark my answer as brainlist

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Lucas is fighting with his younger brother over a toy. His father breaks up the fight and gently explains to Lucas how he could

marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

Authoritative

Explanation:

There are 4 different styles of parenting:

Authoritarian
Authoritative
Permissive
Uninvolved

Both Authoritative and authoritarian styles of parenting focus on authority, this means that they set rules and expect their children to follow the rules.

However, the authoritarian parenting is a cold style of parenting which doesn't allow for questions from the kids ("because I say so") so there is a one directional style of communication. These parents focus on punishing the wrong behavior and they believe in total control and lack of independence from their children.

Authoritative parents are nurturing so they are warmer than the Authoritarian parents, they allow children to ask why so they explain limits by reasoning with their kids, they also focus on teaching the right behaviors rather than punishing the wrong ones and when there are wrong behaviors they focus on consequences rather than on punishments.

Permissive parents think "kids will be kids" so they tend to be very forgiving when it comes to rules and they don't usually set consequences, but, when they do, they don't really stick to them.

Uninvolved parents are cold and distant but also they don't expect much from their children so, basically, their children lack attention, and we can say they are neglected.

In this example, Lucas is fighting over a toy. His father breaks the fight and explains to Lucas how he could have avoided the fight (instead of scolding), Lucas is encouraged to share his feelings and share with his brother.

We can see that there are rules in this family (you are not supposed to fight) and that Lucas' father expects Lucas to follow those rules. However, Lucas' father reasons with him and teaches him the right behavior (share with his brother) rather than punishes the wrong behavior (the fight), he seems to be nurturing by the way he deals with the situation so we can say he is most likely and Authoritative parent.

4 0

3 years ago

A stage of cognitive development that enables one to combine contradictory elements into a comprehensive whole is called _____ t

Marta_Voda [28]

The answer is postformal thought. This is where an individual is likely to engage in accepting intellectural complexities and moral in which is being described as something more logical or flexible. This usually occurs at the age of twelve years old and up to adulthood.

8 0

3 years ago

I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE

gladu [14]

Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethicsemphasises the value of every human beingDuty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.says some acts are always wrongKantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.provides 'certainty'Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.deals with intentions and motivesConsequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.Bad points of duty-based ethicsabsolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.allows acts that make the world a less good placeBecause duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:

...it is hard to believe that it could ever

8 0

3 years ago

Read this excerpt from an article titled "dangerous ideas": in most cases, books are challenged or banned because they introduce

HACTEHA [7]

I think its to show examples of reasons books have been banned
you can check on course hero if its apex

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What would be the best way to affect or change a policy at the national level​

What would be the best way to affect or change a policy at the national level