Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
A monopoly firm is neither productively nor allocative efficient. The reason behind this is that it does not utilize the resources efficiently and produces below the socially optimal level of output.
Unlike perfect competition, which produces at the point where price equals marginal cost, a monopolist produces at the point where the price is greater than marginal cost.
This inefficiency is visible through the decrease in consumer surplus and deadweight loss. The difference between socially optimal level of output and monopoly output also represents inefficiency. The value of the goods and services that could have been made if monopolist chose to produce at a socially optimal level also shows inefficiency.
Answer:
(2) consult others before making a decision.
Before I make a recommendation, I will consult my team members. Individually, some may have new ideas and modifications which we can incorporate into the project to even beat the competition and cause management to continue supporting the project.
Explanation:
Even though our competitor's "product appears to utilize radical new design principles that expand the functionality of the product," we can still modify our product. This will not only incorporate the features of our competitor's product, but also further introduce new features that will emanate from the challenge from competition.
This is where the SCRUM framework becomes important. This framework for project management emphasizes teamwork, accountability, and iterative progress toward a well-defined goal, while allowing for tweaks.
Developing this project based on this framework must have made it possible for us to receive the report from the marketing department in the first place. The principles of Scrum are Openness, Respect, Courage, Commitment, and Focus. So, the best we can do will be to prioritize, come up with new improvement ideas, and convince top management not to cancel the project.
Answer:
Decrease
Explanation:
Calculation to determine overall break-even point for the entire company
Contribution margin for C90B = ($19,950-
$5,985)/$19,950
Contribution margin for C90B = 70%
Contribution margin for Y45E =( $26,190- $10,476)/$26,190
Contribution margin for Y45E= 60%
Therefore Based on the above calculation if the sales mix were to shift toward Product C90B with total dollar sales remaining constant, the overall break-even point for the entire company
Would DECREASE reason been that C90B have more contribution margin ratio of 70% compare to Y45E which had contribution margin ratio of 60%
Answer:
d.$1,371,000
Explanation:
Given that
Warranty liability at the beginning of year = $359,000
Warranty liability at the end of year = $308,000
Warranty expense = $44 million
Sales percentage = 3%
So, the warranty expense = $44,000,000 × 3% = $13,20,000
So, the warranty expenditures for 2018 is
= Beginning warranty liability + warranty expense - ending warranty liability
= $359,000 + $13,20,000 - $308,000
= $1,371,000
The first step is too come up with a plan.Then paperwork that your are going need. Make sure you have transportation etc.
