Answer:
Because they received support from the magisgrates.
Explanation:
Protestants generally trace to the 16th century their separation from the Catholic Church. Protestantism began with the Magisterial Reformation, so called because it received support from the magisgrates (the civil authorities).
Answer : Great Society was a set of domestic programs in the United States launched by Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964–65. The main goal was the total elimination of poverty and racial injustice.
Explanation:
Answer: they also wanted to preserve the liberty of individual citizens, and ensure the government didn’t abuse its power.
To strike this balance, they divided power between three separate branches of government: the legislative, the executive and the judicial.
Explanation:
A. Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida is the correct alternative.
In 1818, Andrew Jackson's hunt for the Red Sticks ended up causing international affairs and diplomacy problems. This happened because the invaded land was Spain's territory and got invaded without any official cause or declarations of war.
Despite the controversy the invasion actually ended up turning Andrew Jackson into a hero and forced the signature of the Adams-Onís Treaty, in 1919. The treaty officially transferred the Florida region to the U.S. from Spanish domain. These events were important for this resolution because even though Spain was angered with the 1818 invasion, it showed their inability to retaliate or conquer back the land. Therefore, the only viable option was for the Spanish to sign the treaty and cede Florida, showing how fragile and unable to the defend the land by the Spanish, relinquishing their last piece of land in the Americas.
Answer:
Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.
What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.
