Answer:
A. She will be deprived of a special celebration to mark an important milestone in her life.
Explanation:
i mean its literally in the passage lol
B. Great mistake.
Hope that helps :)
Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
It's ( They fear for their lives)
*Apex
Answer:
I lazily flipped through the pages of my textbook and yawned.
Explanation:
This would be indirect characterization because it shows the main characters actions and we can gather information about that person due to the fact that in the following sentences she compares herself to her brother.