Answer:
Emily's opportunity cost of producing 1 milkshake is 1 ice cream sundae.
Ben's opportunity cost of producing 1 milkshake is 0.5 ice cream sundae.
Explanation:
Both Emily and Ben own an ice cream parlor.
In an hour Emily can produce 40 milkshakes or 40 ice cream sundaes.
Emily's opportunity cost of producing a milkshake is
= 
= 
= 1 ice cream sundae
In an hour Ben can produce 20 milkshakes or 10 ice cream sundaes.
Ben's opportunity cost of producing a milkshake is
=
= 
= 0.5 ice cream sundae
We see that Ben has a lower opportunity cost of producing milkshake, so we can say that he has a comparative advantage in producing milkshake.
Answer:
a. behavioral
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
a. behavioral
b. cognitive
c. psychodynamic
d. biological
In psychology, the behavioral perspective is a perspective which proposes that our behavior is learned as a result of our interaction with the environment. In other words, we learn from our environment how to act (based on reinforcement, punishment or by seeing other people's actions) and this learning is what determines our behavior.
In this example, Natassia believes that boys learn to be more aggressive because they are more frequently exposed to external pressures to fight. In other words, <u>Natassia believes that aggression is a behavior that boys learn from their environment through the pressure of other people</u>. Thus, this would exemplify the behavioral perspective.
70% children's in adults our homeschool children's it doesn't go to school because they don't want to go school that's why they are homeschool but you sure make him go to school adults they never have the chance to go to school that's why they're homeschool like me
Legislative , executive ,judicial
Answer:
social identity theory.
Explanation:
The social identity theory of the suggestion that an organisation can decide to change the behaviour of individuals if it can bring modifications to their self identity.
It gives specifications and predictions to the situations where people might see themselves as one person or as members of a group.
From this question, we can see that the participants to find themselves based on the group traits to which they belonged. Those that were shared into pulligand defined themselves based on those traits. And nulligans defined themselves based on the nulligan traits.
