Answer:
b. Critics of the government were murdered or imprisoned.
Explanation:
Here is an in-depth explanation for my answer. These have neither dates nor real evidence to back them up, so you will have to find any sources to back up my claims on your own. You're also free to disagree or edit my take of Stalin's totalitarianism; my aim here is just to give a starting point for you to build off of and make your own.
a. Peasants owned land that they could farm.
- Communism and really socialism as a whole brought forth an idea that there should be no privately owned land; any and all land was owned by the federal government, and people simply used it. So, even with little historical knowledge on Stalinism, we can assume this answer is incorrect.
b. Critics of the government were murdered or imprisoned.
- Under Stalinism, there was no room for critique of government. Any party leaders and any critics of Stalinism with goals set on exposing corruption and flaws in current Soviet society were later found dead or jailed, peasants were imprisoned and put into forced labor if they went against the state and also sometimes killed off if they were thought of as spies. In the end, Stalin attempted complete removal of any opposition he may have faced, and used fear tactics to control the Soviet Union as its dictator.
c. Voters could choose between candidates from two political parties.
- Voters could not find any candidats that weren't already killed off by Stalin, so there was no one to vote for other than Stalin himself. Sure, they could vote, but there wasn't a political party other than Stalin's that could grab the brainwashed public's vote.
d. The government set up a court system based on truth and justice.
- If there was a court system to be found in the Soviet Union at the time, it was so unnoteworthy it may as well have not existed in the first place. The "court system" under Stalin rule was basically just an extension of Stalin's power, and Stalin always made sure that any decision was made with his consent or with his consent in mind.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This question is missing something important. The part that is missing I am going to include it in capital letters.
Identify domestic events that prompted ATTACKS ON civil liberties such as the Red Scare, Palmer Raids, Fundamentalism, Marcus Garvey Back to Africa Movement, and the KKK to those attacks.
Once clarified this issue, we can say the following.
I am going to choose the case of the Red Scare and the Palm Raids. The domestic events that prompted attacks on civil liberties in the United States in the times of the First Red Scare were the following.
The country lived in uncertain years in which the threat of the spread of Communism and Anarchism really affected the federal government and scare the American society because the government released propaganda campaigns saying that Communism was the worst thing that could ever happen in the United States.
Anyone could accuse you of being Communists or anarchists, and that was enough to be persecuted by the Police.
The Palmer raids started in November 1919 and ended in January 1920. President Woodrow Wilson had ordered to cease civil liberties to people accused of being communist or anarchists. So the Department of Justice arrested many people under the suspect of being those things. Many European immigrants, basically Italian, were arrested just under suspect, not because there was evidence of their conduct.
These were the times of the First Red Scare.
Answer:
Rapid industrialization caused discontent among the people, the growth of factories brought new problems, poor working conditions, really low wages, child labor, outlawed trade unions. ... War and revolution destroyed the Russian economy. Trade was at a standstill.
Explanation:
=>
Answer:
C. Marge felt that the chances of the expensive, new car malfunctioning were remote.
Explanation:
The definition of imminent is an event or action that has yet to happen but is bound to happen very soon.
Here is the definition from the Oxford Dictionary
1. (adjective) <em>about to happen.</em>
A, <em>"The committee told us that time for the awarding of prizes was very close,"</em> is an example of this because it says that the prizes about to be rewarded very soon. Basically saying that the awarding of prizes is imminent.
B, <em>"Jake knew some kind of punishment for his forgetfulness was fast approaching," </em>means that Jake's punishment is fast approaching. In other words, Jake's punishment is imminent.
These two are not the answer, because we're looking for the antonym, or opposite of the meaning of imminent. That leaves C. Which has nothing to do with the word imminent or anything that is about to happen.
I hope this helped :D
They had to create a state government acceptable to congress
