Answer:
A). Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
B). Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
E). Thinking about a possible counterclaim.
Explanation:
As per the question, when the negative or opponent is presenting claim with along with the evidence one is required to <u>'pay complete attention to what he/she says'</u> as it would help in preparing the counterclaim accordingly and more efficiently to rebut or neglect his ideas. Then, <u>'Identification of important pieces of evidence that the negative uses'</u> as it help produce sufficient rebuttal evidence to counter it efficiently. Next, would be <u>'Thinking about a possible counterclaim'</u> to deny his claim and establish the credibility of his claim. Thus, <u>options A, B, and E</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
Letter to a friend.
Explanation:
674, Boulevard Appartments,
New York City, US
Dear Alice,
How are you doing? I hope this letter finds you in good health. I am doing good but facing some problems at school.
You know that our school is regarded as the best and top-rated schools in our city, but there are some practices that I don't like. For instance, there is no practicality in our studies. All we are imparted with is theoretical knowledge. No practical learning skills are being practiced in this school. The second problem is that there is a load of subjects to study. I mean, first, they already teach us only theory, then, they don't give us any choice in subjects, we have to study a lot of subjects. And, lastly, we hardly get any time to freshen our minds. We seldom get sports periods in a week. Many times our sports periods are also taken up by our subject teachers as a substitute.
I am thinking to send an email to our board members because it is really stressing out all students. Such tireless teaching is making our brain process slow. What do you say about this? I hope to listen from you soon.
With love,
Tina
