Answer:
B. Unless Christine finishes her calculus homework, she will have to suffer Mr. Nguyen's wrath in class tomorrow.
Explanation:
In the given sentences, the main errors to be focused on will be the use of punctuation, the commas, and the construction of the sentences. This will enable us to easily identify which sentence is the right one.
Looking at the sentence, the first part of it starts with a subordinating conjunction, thus making it a dependent clause. And as understood, dependent clauses cannot stand on their own as a complete or full sentence, they need an independent clause to be completed. Thus comes the second part of the sentence which is an independent clause.
Thus, when a dependent clause and an independent clause are together, and the dependent clause starts the sentence, then the separation of the two clauses is done by a comma. In this case, the comma will come in between "homework" and "she".
The final sentence will become
<em>"Unless Christine finishes her calculus homework, she will have to suffer Mr. Nguyen's wrath in class tomorrow."</em>
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
It is an opinion rather than a fact because there is no data to support that all service members and veterans have challenges when they return. There are no factual statistics or data to back up this claim so therefore it is an opinion
Answer: The reader is waiting to find out details of the murder.
Explanation: Suspense is a state of feeling nervous or excitement. This is shown in option 2.
Answer:
Which statement explains the reasoning and evidence used to support the claim that a principality created by the people is easier to rule?
Explanation:
The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
Hope this was helpful
