1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Simora [160]
2 years ago
15

Describe the living conditions that reformers wanted to change during this era. please put it into your own words.

History
1 answer:
weqwewe [10]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

lease their own houses and mansions to accommodate people.

Explanation:

During the late 1800s and early 1900s, cities popped up and grew exponentially in different parts of the country, especially in the North, with the coming of the Early Industrial Revolution.

With this growth, there was also a huge influx of immigrants and rural Americans to the cities which led to overcrowding. Consequently numerous social problems like inadequate housing, unclean water, crimes, etc. arose in many parts of the cities.

In order to tackle these problems, reformers started to lease their own houses and mansions to accommodate as much people as they could. The Hull House was one among such buildings that accomodated poor people and low income families.

You might be interested in
What is the answer in us goverment and citizenship
snow_lady [41]

When it comes to the power of government, the preamble states that:

  • The government has a responsibility to protect people's rights, not to control their lives. .
  • A government is empowered by the consent of the governed.

<h3>What does the preamble to the Constitution state?</h3>

The Preamble to the Constitution states that the government is meant to protect the natural rights of the people without infringing on these rights and controlling their lives.

The government's power to govern comes from the consent of the governed which they give through elections.

Find out more on the preamble to the Constitution at brainly.com/question/17188061

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an example of a secondary source?
yulyashka [42]
I'm pretty sure A is the secondary source. All of the others come directly from the source/person, but an interview is getting someone else's view.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP! :) What impact did the Cotten gin have upon the South?
gregori [183]
It picked seeds out of cotton and helped the people sew
8 0
3 years ago
How did Gorbachev attempt to reform Soviet foreign policy
nasty-shy [4]
Glosnost (sp?)- the opening of the USSR to the rest of the world and western goods/ideas.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were the steps the people of Florence took to stop the spread of plague in the city? Select all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • What benefit were colonies supposed to have for the nations who had them?
    6·1 answer
  • What tools did they use to mummify pharaohs in ancient Egypt
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the puritans leave England of America
    15·1 answer
  • Who lived in qasgiq?​
    13·1 answer
  • Together, the Black Codes and actions of white extremist groups:
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these acts of terrorism happened during the Munich olympics in 1972, but were not enough to end the olympics? Group of
    7·2 answers
  • The Super Soaker builds up ________ by forcing air inside a liquid-filled chamber.
    5·1 answer
  • Is that correct?? I NEED HELP ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • A word that might describe all Viking raiders, traders, explorers, and settlers is
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!