Which of the following best describes William Jennings Bryan’s political experience?

History

1 answer:

Alexxandr [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

William Jennings Bryan (March 19, 1860 – July 26, 1925) was an American orator and politician from Nebraska. According to Grover Cleveland, the rise of the Bryan forces in the Democratic Party in 1896 marked the end of laissez-faire politics in American Government.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

The Jungle by Upton Sinclair was actually a novel (fiction) about immigrants and working class poverty, but it has a section abo

torisob [31]

It led to the Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906

5 0

4 years ago

If an investor possesses a portfolio heavily concentrated in Certificates of Deposit, a financial advisor would most likely sugg

Luda [366]

A good financial manner is going to instruct a first time investor to check that he has enough money in savings in emergency cash for three to six months.

Then any money invested. E aware that you could loose 100 percent of it.

CDs are lucky to pay out 1 Percent. However, the first step would be a money market account. An IRA is a financial tool to put stocks or bonds into which could be intended to grow most aggressively if you have the time horizon of youth and can afford to loose money. That same term IRA could alternatively be intended to preserve capitol and have overweight of bonds. The mix and weighting of bonds to stocks favors bonds as we age. Futures is not something for the average investor and includes commodities.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What innovation do you believe had the greatest impact on society?<br> PLEASE ANSWER QUICK !!!

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

I believe the printing press. Before the printing press books were very rare and expensive. Most religious scrolls were put on cloth or papyrus(a type of plant). After the invention of the printing press it made books less rare and expensive. And launched the world into a more modern era.

3 0

3 years ago

You are an archaeologist who uncovers a new site of early human activity. Currently, there is evidence of humans living in this

TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

It means that humans lived in that area longer than expected, approximately 28,650 years ago.

Explanation:

Ok, this coud be tricky especially taking in count that Radiocarbon dating has other variables that archaeologist take into account so this answer should be taked as an approximation.

Radiocarbon dating measures the amount of carbon-14 (an isotope) in organic objects like bones, plants, wood, charcoal etc...

This is possible because the atmosphere is constantly producing carbon. While a human, animal or tree/plant is alive its amount of carbon is the same as that of the atmosphere. When they die, their amount of carbon kind of "freezes", because it doesnt renew.

Carbon-14 has a peculiarity, every 5730 years its amount in organic objects is cut in half (50%), so for example if the amount of carbon-14 in a dog is 5000 the day it dies, and today the amount found in his skull/bones is 2500, it means that this dog died 5730 years ago.

So for the question:

If a current skull contains a carbon 14 count of 10,000 and the fossil found in the archeological site contains 312.5 we candapproximately find how long ago this human died:

We start by halving 10,000 till we reach the amount found in the skull which is 312.5

$\frac{10,000}{2} = 5,000$