The matching of the words to complete the analogy in the given image is given below:
- 1 church
- 2 daughter
- 3 tagay tay
- 4 hero
- 5 airport
- 6 dilis
- 7 manila bay
- 8 november
When a full sentence is made, we can see that the first answer is:
As the teacher is to school, a priest is to <u>church.</u>
<h3>What is an Analogy?</h3>
This refers to the use of words to make comparisons of words and how they relate in a given context.
Hence, we can see that The matching of the words to complete the analogy in the given image is given above.
Read more about analogy here:
brainly.com/question/24452889
#SPJ1
In the excerpt from Thunberg's speech, she moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions, as explained below.
<h3>What is Thunberg's reasoning?</h3>
This question concerns the ending of the speech given by Greta Thunberg at the United Nations. Thunberg mentions the following:
- We can still have a 67% chance to stay below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise.
- To accomplish that, back in 2018, we had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit.
- However, that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
- In conclusion, our CO2 budget will be over in just 8 and a half years.
We can see that Thunberg goes from a general premise to a specific prediction about emissions. The premise consists of everything she says about the amount of CO2 we are allowed to emit. The prediction is that we will use up that amount in just 8 years.
With the information above in mind, we can select option B as the correct answer concerning Thunberg's reasoning. She moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions.
The missing excerpt is the following:
"To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
"How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years."
Learn more about Greta Thunberg here:
brainly.com/question/28419470
#SPJ1
The details that Ban Ki-moon uses to support his point of view and the purpose of the speech are the sentences that show evidence that his point of view is correct.
<h3>What are these pieces of evidence?</h3>
- Statistical data supporting the point of view.
- Facts that show the relevance of the point of view.
- Tested and proven information about the point of view presented.
Therefore, to find the supporting details of the speech, you must read the entire speech, identify the author's point of view, and look for the evidence that supports that point of view.
This question is incomplete, as you did not show the speech to which it refers. In this case, I can't give you a specific answer, but I hope the above information will help you find your answer.
More information about textual evidence at the link:
brainly.com/question/375033
2. since you use or the subject is singular, and you have to use is
