Actually, this answer would be true. Why?
The first equation is: a(sub <em>n</em>) = 8, 13, 18, 23
The second is: a(sub 1)=8 ; a(sub <em>n</em>)= a(sub <em>n</em>-1)+5
if you wish to find the second term, plug two into the equation for <em /><em>n</em>
8+5=13
to find the third, plug the second term, 13, in for <em>n.</em>
13+5=18.
Hope this helped! I know it's a bit on the late side, but at least you can get the general idea!
Step-by-step explanation:
-w - 11 < or = w - 5
-2w - 11 < or = -5
-2w < or = -16
w > or = -8
Answer:
y
Step-by-step explanation:
Henrietta solved a rational equation by multiplying both sides by
.She did not find the least common multiple of the denominators .If she had find the least common denominator which is 3x(x+2) then the question can have been simplified in more simpler form.
Henrietta can have got rid of denominator and then use the distributive rule .
So the first option
A:She could use the least common multiple of the denominator is right
Answer: The value of a is 1. The value of b is -1. The value of c is 1. The value of the discriminant is -3. The quadratic function will not intersects the x-axis.
Explanation:
The standard form of a quadratic equation is,

The given function is,

It can be written as,

By comparing this equation with the standard form of quadratic equation. we get,



The formula for discriminant is,




The value of the discriminant is -3.
If D<0, it means the function have no real roots.
If D=0, it means function have one real roots.
If D>0, it means function have two real roots.
Since D<0 it means the function have no real roots. So the function will not intersect the x-axis at any point.