1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Afina-wow [57]
3 years ago
8

In order to be elected President of the United States, a candidate must first register as a candidate. Then, he/she must win his

/her party's primary to become the party's official nominee for President. In November, he/she must receive a majority of the electoral vote in order to become the next President of the United States.
What can you conclude from this information?
A) Primaries are too important.
B) Becoming President is not a quick process.
C) The popular vote does not matter in elections.
D) Money does not matter in winning the Presidential election.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Goryan [66]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: B

Explanation:

Through the process of elimination, you can see that b is the answer because the information does show primaries are important, but they dont really play a role in every part of becoming president.

The answers not c because the popular vote does count since they must receive an electoral vote. And d is not the answer because money is necessary for political parties [to fund their purpose]

ahrayia [7]3 years ago
3 0
Your answer would be B!:)
You might be interested in
Most peoples of sub-Saharan Africa speak a language that is part of which family? A) Bantu B) Swahili C) Ashanti D) Egyptian
ankoles [38]

Swahili is spoken by a majority of the people in sub-Saharan Africa.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Munich Conference serve as an example of appeasement?
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

READ BELOW

Explanation:

It gave Adolf Hitler free control of Austria and the Sutenland in Czechslovakia

3 0
3 years ago
How has the government tried to end wage discrimination?
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

The government has tried to end wage discrimination since back in 2016 when the state lawmakers introduced at least 180 bills across the country aimed at shrinking the pay gap. Seven were enacted, dozens are pending and nearly 50 either failed or were vetoed. A year prior, 76 equal pay-related bills were introduced in 33 states. And it’s not just progressive states like California taking the wage gap seriously. Louisiana, North Dakota and Utah are just three examples of Republican states advancing such legislation, said Emily Martin, a legal expert on equal pay. In North Dakota, for instance, a bill passed in 2015 strengthening employer's salary reporting requirements. The state, which overwhelmingly voted for Trump in the 2016 election, proves the issue of pay equity is still being addressed in conservative areas. “I’m glad that states are really focusing on equal pay and exploring new policy solutions to ensure women are paid equally to men, in part because federal policy-making is at best stalled on this issue, and at worst, we might be seeing rollbacks in coming years,” Martin, who serves as general counsel and vice president for workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center, told NBC News.While equal pay laws passed by Congress include the Equal Pay Act passed of 1963, states are offering creative solutions to expand protections for women and close federal loopholes. Don't Ask, Don't Tell

Bills that prohibit employers from requiring job applicants to reveal their salary history can prevent pay discrimination from following a woman throughout her career. In 2016, Massachusetts enacted first-of-its-kind legislation forbidding employers from inquiring about salary history. Since then, California has followed suit and nearly 20 states have introduced similar measures. “If your new employer is setting how much you make based on how much you made at your last job, given that women tend to be paid less than men, it has the effect of replicating those wage disparities through a woman’s career as she shifts from job to job,” Martin said. “We’ve seen a lot of interest in other states in replicating [Massachusetts’s law].” California, Delaware, Maryland and Connecticut are among the states in 2016 that strengthened laws prohibiting bosses from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages with coworkers. As of 2017, 17 states had "pay secrecy" laws on the books, and some are looking to strengthen existing law. But several states, including Arizona, continue to allow such practices from employers. “You can’t challenge pay discrimination if you don’t know you’re being paid less than a male coworker, but a lot of employers either have formal policies prohibiting employees from talking to each other about wages or strong implicit disapproval for employees talking to each other about wages,” Martin said. Delaware Gov. Jack Markell signed H.B. 314 into law in 2016, making it illegal for employers to require employees to sign a document waiving the right to discuss salaries with other workers. Making Fewer Businesses Exempt

Several states have equal pay protections that don’t apply to smaller businesses or to workers in the private sector, where the wage gap tends to be more pronounced due to a less transparent pay structure. Five states— Utah, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia — exempt small businesses from enforcing equal pay protections, while Louisiana's laws only apply to public workers.

In March, Nebraska amended its equal pay protections to encompass businesses that employ at least two workers per day. Previously, the law applied to businesses with more than 15 workers. “The bottom line is line is protections need to cover everyone and they need to be strong and robust,” Kate Nielson, the state policy analyst for the American Association of University Women, told NBC News. But Will State Legislation Be Enough?

On Equal Pay D

6 0
3 years ago
When reading a nonfiction book that relates to the fairy tale read in the basal reader, the teacher is disappointed because her
dem82 [27]

Options available are:

A) Wait until the next day; maybe the children will be ready to discuss it later.

B) Pause periodically and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story and to ask questions about anything that is unclear.

C) Tell the children to listen carefully an+9d reread the story aloud very slowly to facilitate understanding.

D) Stop reading the story until students are more engaged in the text.

Answer:

B) Pause periodically and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story and to ask questions about anything that is unclear.

Explanation:

The right answer is Option B due to the following reasons:

1. By pausing periodically, and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story, will encourage the children to be involved, by trying to impress the teacher that they are actively following the teacher or the story. With such strategy, those students will want to listen attentively to be get what the teacher is reading, and then narrate it when asked.

2. By letting them to ask questions about anything that is unclear, will not only give room to for students to get clarification about any ambiguity in the story, but also give room for interactions with the teacher, and opportunity to evaluate when and where they seem lost in the story.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the researchers present unshelled northern and southern periwinkles to northern and southern crabs in the second experim
Anika [276]

The researchers present unshelled northern and southern periwinkles to northern and southern crabs in the second experiment to test if either population of periwinkles was unpalatable to either population of crabs.

Answer: Option D

<u>Explanation:</u>

The researchers picked up crabs and periwinkles from the northern and the southern location of Gulf of Maine. Then an individual crab was inserted into hutch companied with 8 size variable periwinkles. Following four set-ups were organized, where crabs involved were of both gender but not size variable and these set-ups were analyzed 12-14 times:

  • Northern crab and periwinkles
  • Southern crab and periwinkles
  • Northern crab and southern periwinkles
  • Southern crab and northern periwinkles

After three days of experiment conclusion drawn was: southern crab killed more number of northern periwinkles when compared with rest three set-ups. While second is northern crab and northern periwinkles, third is southern crab and periwinkles and fourth is northern crab and southern periwinkles.

Now, same set-ups as above was organized but with unshelled northern and southern periwinkles and conclusion researchers found that crabs catered themselves with all unshelled periwinkles within 1 hour to test if either periwinkles population was unpalatable to either crabs population.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a characteristic of a state?
    11·2 answers
  • How did Rosa Parks protest against the law that said black people could not sit next to white people on buses?
    13·1 answer
  • The Law of Supply states thatA)the supply of a product is not affected by its price.B)when the supply of a product decreases, th
    15·1 answer
  • Where did the govenor of jamestown live
    9·2 answers
  • Who was the most famous slave rebellion in the south led by in the 1831
    7·2 answers
  • Please help I will reward brainly
    11·1 answer
  • Was the new deal a good deal
    12·2 answers
  • What did you learn about yourself? What stressors and or "hassles" do you recognize in your life? What measures can you take in
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following would not be descriptive of the outer Coastal Plain?
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE TELL ME SOMEBODY KNOWS HOW TO DO THIS ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO WHO ANSWERS CORRECTLY
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!