Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Personal/Core values are incredibly important in many ways. All-in-all they basically define the kind of person you are and what you stand for. having strong personal values allows you to easily surround yourself with other individuals that share the same values as you while also dropping those that do not. Aside from forming these bonds, strong personal values also help you strengthen these positive friendships as you go getting to know the other individuals better and your values keep aligning, therefore leading to sustained positive relationships.
Answer:
u cant pay happinesss hapines is on your mouth
