Answer:
He is referring to people who reject a responsibility that is theirs.
Explanation:
Through the context of your question, we can see that you are referring to the article "Hers" written by Jacoby, where he reflects on censorship, feminism, obscenity and p0r.n0g*4p** within a society. For Jacoby, the censorship of works with content considered obscene and p0r.n0g*4p*c is an insult to the first constitutional amendment, since for him these works represent the freedom of expression that is allowed within the country. Within this context, he states that it is not the State's duty to carry out this type of censorship, but that each citizen must decide whether or not he wants to consume this type of content, when he is of the right age to make that decision.
Although in the article, he agrees that children should not have access to such works, he says that it is the duty of parents to prevent children from having access to works with obscene content and not the duty of the government. In this case, children cannot be used as an argument to defend p0r.n0g*4p** censorship, except by people who reject their responsibility because of the general desire to transfer that responsibility to institutions.
Much of the mythology of the Iroquois (a confederacy of originally Five, later Six Nations of Native Americans) has been preserved, including creation stories and some folktales. Recorded in wampum as recitations, written down later, the spellings of names differed as transliteration varies and spellings even in European languages were not entirely regularized. Different versions of some stories exist, reflecting different localities and different times. It is possible that the written versions were influenced by Christianity.
Each village had its own storyteller who was responsible for learning all the stories by heart. No stories were ever told during the summer months. Violations would be punished by the Jo-ga-oh, and if the violator ignored the warning he would suffer greater evils.
I hope this helps idk if it will
Answer:
Year-round schools are a bad idea. ... Year-round schools restrict summer family vacations. They also don't allow students to go away to camp or take on summer jobs to earn money for the future. Too many breaks disrupt learning.
Spending time at the beginning of a school year explaining classroom routines and expectations can feel like a waste of instructional time. However, it gives students a chance to practice important soft skills like adapting to new procedures, handling different work styles, and learning new schedules.
With most schools on a nine-month schedule, extracurricular activities have learned to plan their programs accordingly. Therefore, students at a year-round school may not have availability to experience certain outside activities like summer sports teams or camps.
It costs more to run a school year-round. Along with paying staff, the school building itself will require more funds for heating and cooling to keep the school running comfortably.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. The repetition of exclamation marks is part of the poem's lyric structure and conveys that each comparison is highly emotional for the speaker.
Explanation:
In this poem, the use of exclamation marks repeatedly is part of the poem's lyric structure. It actually helps to convey how each comparison is emotional for the speaker.
The speaker compares his separation from his beloved to the desolation of winter. He's been forced to endure the separation. So, such comparison is highly emotional.
Answer:
Some might say that it interferes with people's right to free speech
Explanation:
