<span>6(−3−x)−2x=14
x= -4
14=2c-6+3c
c= 4
</span><span>−7.5(x−3)=3.75
</span><span>x= 2.5
</span><span>3/5(r−7)=1
</span>r= 26/3
3.5 (t+6)=7
D) -4
Hope this helps ^.^
NO. they are not. Nothing in this question or sentences make sense to a linear pair.
- I’m assuming the expression implies the following:
(1-n)/(n^2 - 1)
The steps goes as follows:
= -(n-1)/(n^2-1) (factored a negative out)
= -(n-1)/[(n+1)(n-1)] (Factored denominator into a difference of squares, but don’t just blindly accept the fact, expand it and you should get the original denominator)
At this point, the (n-1) terms cancel, as you should know: a real number, besides 0, over itself is 1.
= -1/(n+1) , which is the answer
Note: You could also see it as 1/-(n+1) or 1/(-n-1)
Answer:
15%
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the followign simple interest formula
FV (aka AV)=PV(1+it)
which means that we have
(800+360)=800(1+3i)
1.45=1+3i
.45=3i
.15=i
15%
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
