There is no illustration, so it is impossible to answer this question. I apologise.
Answer:
$170
Step-by-step explanation:
Sally costs 30
Max costs 40
Goliath costs 80(1.25) = 100
add them up
$170
Answer:
-4 to -1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
When the graph start to slope downwards or go down its decreasing. So when the hump starts to go down at (-4,0) it then starts to go up again after (-1.5,0). Hope this helps:)
Answer:
The pair (0,3) is not a solution to the equation
Step-by-step explanation:
This can be proved by simply replacing the x and y variables in the equation by the x and y values of the pair, and checking if the equation renders a true statement:
By replacing x and y with their values in the pair (0,3), that is x=0 and y=3, in the equation y = 5 - 2x we get:
3 = 5 - 2 (0)
3 = 5 - 0
3 = 5
which is NOT a true statement.
On the other hand, the other two pairs (2,1) and (1,3) render true statements:
1 = 5 - 2 (2)
1 = 5 - 4
1 = 1
and
3 = 5 - 2 (1)
3 = 5 - 2
3 = 3
Answer:
Technically neither, but Mia is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + b
Since our slope <em>m</em> is equal to 6, it is a positive number. That means that the slope/line will be positive, so the line should be going up, not down. That means the blue line would be correct. Therefore, Mia is correct.
Technicality:
Since the blue line is dotted, the equation should be a <em>inequality </em>and not a linear equation. No solutions on the line would technically work. If the equation was y < 6x + 4 or something with an inequality sign, then it would be correct.
