Explanation:
what= the immigration act of 1924 limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the United states through a national origins quota. the quota provided immigration visas to two percent of the total of people of each nationality in the United states as of 1890 census.
why=in the 1920s ,restrictions on immigration increased. the immigration act of 1924 was most severe:it limited the overall number of immigrants and established quotas based on nationality.Among other things, the act sharply reduces immigrants from eastern Europe and Africa.
when=congress passed on emergency quota act in 1921 followed by the immigration act in 1924.
where=approximately half of immigrants living in the united states are from mexico and other latin american countries.
who=immigration to the United states in the late 1800s , between 1870s and 1900, the largest number of immigrants continued to come from northern and western Europe including great britain,scandanavia and ireland. but 'new' immigrants from southern and eastern europe were becoming one of the most important forces in american life.
B. Lincoln had not dealt sternly enough with the southerners.
Answer: B
Explanation: Robert Fulton built the first successful steamboat. :)
Answer:
Because the company promoted a biased description of virgins by establishing only the good points about it, while Smith and Frethorne's accounts were more realistic and impartial.
Explanation:
The company promoted a description where it only addressed the qualities of Vírginia. This was done to help settlers and show the state as a wonderful and flawless earth. In fact, Vírginia had advantages, but the description of the company was completely biased and incomplete in many factors. John Smith and Richard Frethorne, on the other hand, presented more complete reports, as they were indeed familiar with the territory. They presented a more impartial report, describing the state as it really was, without alleviating possible defects.
1. Americans did not have representations in British Parliament, which means they didn't have any say in what they can or cannot do.
2. Britain literally had a king.
