1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ad-work [718]
2 years ago
13

Who was the first Tudor monarch to rule England?

History
2 answers:
Margarita [4]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Henry VII (7th)  

Explanation:

He was the first monarch of the House of Tudor.

crown on 22 August 1485 from April 1509 (death)

Hope that helps

AURORKA [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Henry VII

Henry VII (Welsh: Harri Tudur; 28 January 1457 – 21 April 1509) was the King of England and Lord of Ireland from his seizure of the crown on 22 August 1485 to his death. He was the first monarch of the House of Tudor.

Explanation:

I hope this helps and pls mark me brainliest :)

You might be interested in
What would a person become after being a paid assistant? apprentice journeyman master guild director
lys-0071 [83]

Generally speaking, after being an apprentice, a person would become a "journeyman," since this required a higher set of skills and expertise. This was not always the case, however.

4 0
2 years ago
The chart below shows the percentage of total government revenue from oil in Nigeria between 1967 and 1990.
katrin2010 [14]
According to the graph, we can say that <span>Nigeria was generating greater revenue from oil in 1990 compared to previous years. </span><span>If we look on the table, we can see how the oil industry has covered more of the economy, so if it went down, Nigeria would get in serious economical problems.</span>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Soviet disregard for the effects of industrialization a. helped restore the nation’s environment. b. had little effect on th
agasfer [191]
C. Severely damaged the country's air, water, and soil.
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following BEST explains the difference between civilian deaths in WW I and WW II?
nevsk [136]

The reason why there is such a difference between civilian deaths in WWI and WWII was that civilians were deliberately targeted in WWII.

<h3>Why were there more civilian deaths in WWII?</h3>

In WWII, the combatants targeted civilians directly in some cases as opposed to WWI where civilian deaths were limited.

For instance, WWII saw the Nazis targeting specific populations such as Jews. The allies also targeted civilian areas during their bombing raids in order to pressure the Nazis to surrender.

Find out more on civilian deaths in WWII at brainly.com/question/10577518.

8 0
2 years ago
What are the 4 functions of government
elena-s [515]

1) to keep power equal in all 3 branches ( Checks and balances)

2) to provide national security

3) to have a econmic equality (money)

4) to pass laws so that we can live in a better country


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What four Main areas does the Stimlus Package Address?
    7·1 answer
  • If Joseph Stalin had set lower production quotas for his first Five-Year Plan, he would have...
    9·1 answer
  • Before the Civil War began, which issue played the GREATEST role in increasing tension and conflict between northern and souther
    10·2 answers
  • What were two advantages to steamboat transportation?
    14·1 answer
  • La propagande antisemite
    5·1 answer
  • What issues did the Roman Republic face that led to its demise?
    14·2 answers
  • Why do countries join together in trade blocs?
    10·2 answers
  • Historians often call Bhakti Thapa a Budho Baagh (an old tiger) due to his energy and will power. Justify the claim highlighting
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following grew during the New Imperialism?
    15·1 answer
  • What was one way the work of the Society of Jesus affected native peoples?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!