The battle of bunker hill in 1775 showed- whether the americans would win the war , so yes !
Bad, like bad bad. the soldiers were not all soldiers, most of them were tradesmen: blacksmiths, carpenters, farmer, etc. These “soldiers” were not prepared for what happened. The soldiers went through their rations quickly and ate a mixture of flour and water to survive. The sanitary conditions of the camp were terrible because they were nit knowledgeable to put the latrine, the hole they peed, pooped, and threw-up in, far enough away from the camp so that no one got sick. Also it was winter in Pennsylvania, so it was freezing and snowing. The quarters of soldiers were cloths draped over sticks until the cabins were built later. And all of the previous was the conditions of those who were not injured or dying. Those who were injured were having body parts sawed off with woodworking saws without and pain relieving medication, except alcohol. They felt all of it. In conclusion, the soldier were cold, tired, starved, weak, and in some cases crippled. Those who had died early were considered lucky.
Homefield advantage is the answer
Correct answer: A. They may have been inspired by real events and real people.
Detail:
A legend differs from a myth, in that legends generally do have some element of truth in their background. There was a real person or some real event far back in history, but as time went on stories about that person or event are magnified and mystical or symbolic elements are added.
An example would be the legendary stories about King Arthur in Britain. There is some historical debate, with some suggesting there was no actual historical person behind the legends. But there are strong suggestions that the Arthur stories are based on a King Arthur in Britain during the era of Roman rule, around the end of the 5th / beginning of the 6th century.
