All categories

3 years ago

The hole in Neils was _____. jacket was you barely noticed it.

English

1 answer:

inysia [295]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The hole in Neil's jacket was subtle. You barely noticed it.

Explanation:

In order to solve this question, you need to know what the words you were given mean. When you're unsure about what a word means, you can look it up in a dictionary - an alphabetically arranged listing of words that contains various information about them, such as their definitions, examples, origin, pronunciation, etc.

The word you're looking for is subtle. When something is subtle, it isn't noticeable or obvious in any way. Since someone didn't notice the hole in Neil's jacket, we can say that it is subtle.

We use the word anonymous to talk about people who aren't identified by their name.

Poverty is the state of being extremely poor.

You might be interested in

Help me please worth 10 points

tatiyna

Answer:

Irony is defined as a contradiction between verbal, situational, and dramatic sarcasm and contradiction between appearance and reality.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is Wire and rubber are bendable, while gloss ?

Rzqust [24]

Answer:

white gloss ?

Wire and rubber are bendable, while glass is not

5 0

3 years ago

The magic of South African summer

Lelu [443]

Answer:

wow do you know how to do actural magic sorry just saking

3 0

2 years ago

What is Obama's refutation in his speech?

fomenos

Answer:

Twelve years ago, Barack Obama introduced himself to the American public by way of a speech given at the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, in which he declared, “There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America, an Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” Few of us believed this to be true, but most, if not all of us, longed for it to be. We vested this brash optimist with our hope, a resource that was in scarce supply three years after the September 11th terrorist attacks in a country mired in disastrous military conflicts in two nations. The vision he offered—of national reconciliation beyond partisan bounds, of government rooted in respect for the governed and the Constitution itself, of idealism that could actually be realized—became the basis for his Presidential campaign. Twice the United States elected to the Presidency a biracial black man whose ancestry and upbringing stretched to three continents.

At various points that idealism has been severely tested. During his Presidency, we witnessed a partisan divide widen into an impassable trench, and gun violence go unchecked while special interests blocked any regulation. The President was forced to show his birth certificate, which we recognized as the racial profiling of the most powerful man in the world. Obama did not, at least publicly, waver in his contention that Americans were bound together by something greater than what divided them. In July, when he spoke in Dallas after a gunman murdered five police officers, he seemed pained by the weight of this faith, as if stress fractures had appeared in a load-bearing wall.

It is difficult not to see the result of this year’s Presidential election as a refutation of Obama’s creed of common Americanism. And on Wednesday, for the first time in the twelve years that we’ve been watching him, Obama did not seem to believe the words he was speaking to the American public. In the White House Rose Garden, Obama offered his version of a concession speech—an acknowledgement of Donald Trump’s victory. The President attempted gamely to cast Trump’s victory as part of the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes, and as an example of the great American tradition of the peaceful transfer of power. (This was not, it should be recalled, the peaceful transfer of power that most observers were worried about.) He intended, he said, to offer the same courtesy toward Trump that President George W. Bush had offered him, in 2008. Yet that reference only served to highlight the paradox of Obama's Presidency: he now exists in history bracketed by the overmatched forty-third President and the misogynistic racial demagogue who will succeed him as the forty-fifth. During his 2008 campaign, Obama frequently found himself—and without much objection on his part—compared to Abraham Lincoln. He may now share an ambivalent common bond with Lincoln, whose Presidency was bookended by James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two lesser lights of American history.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please hurry!!! ps please do not put a link!!!!!

Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

you don't want to confuse your audience

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers