The final answer would depend in the type of triangle we are analyzing, however here are the possible outcomes:
1.) If it was a right triangle, 36.5 would be the smaller angle.
2.) It cannot be an equilateral triangle since all angles would be 60°.
3.) In a isosceles triangle, 36.5° would be the smaller, since the others would be 72°.
4.) In an scalene triangle it cannot be determined unless we had 2 angles since in that kind of triangle all angles can be different.
5.) In an acute triangle, 36.5° would be the smaller angle.
6.) In an obtuse triangle it cannot be determined unless we had 2 angles, since it can have highly acute angles.
Answer:
I cant answer this question since there is no table or graph
Answer:
I am seeing you a LOT
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
NO.
Step-by-step explanation:
No because 13 > 4 + 5.
[(21 + 5) ÷ 2] + 7 × (8 - 3)
[26 ÷ 2] + 7 × (8 - 3)
13 + 7 × (8 - 3)
13 + 7 × 5
13 + 35
48
